Top 10 most dangerous countries for tourism. Hmm you may note believe it, most of them are African countries!
http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/06-05-2013/124487-most_dangerous_countries_tourism-0/

06.05.2013

There are countries in the world where local people and even more so tourists feel uncomfortable. These are mostly countries with high level of crime such as murder, robbery in the streets, corruption, hostage-taking, terrorism, and so on. But tourists enamored by local beauty sometimes do not even think about it.
The influential magazine Forbes has compiled a rating of the most dangerous countries. The vast majority of them are in Africa. The safest countries are in Europe. The authors of the list used information provided by major companies in the field of risk analysis, Control-Risks and iJet Intelligent Risk Systems, as well as the U.S. State Department. The safety of traveling to certain countries was estimated according to the information about the level of crime, civil unrest, police protection, threats, attacks, kidnappings, and geopolitical stability.

1. Somali. This country is called the “modern Tortuga” thanks to the gangs of pirates that work along the coast and attack foreign ships, kidnap people and demand ransom.
2. Afghanistan. Despite the fact that there are still coalition forces, the overall situation is very difficult. Attacks of the “Taliban” movement only increase, terrorist attacks occur frequently and civilians are killed. In addition, the country has a very difficult situation with drug trafficking.
3. Iraq. This country sees almost weekly attacks arranged by Al-Qaeda militants.
• Print version
• Font Size
• Send to friend
4. Congo. Since 1998, this country has been emerged in armed conflict that claimed the lives of over 5.5 million people.
5. Pakistan. Hostilities are ongoing between the rebels in north-west Pakistan and government troops.
6. Gaza Strip. Israeli military operation ended in January 2009, but air strikes on Gaza still continue.
7. Yemen. The country has militaristic groups associated with al-Qaeda. In addition, the state’s oil reserves are being depleted rapidly, which can cause further deterioration of the situation in the country.
8. Zimbabwe. The country has a multi-million inflation and high levels of corruption, resulting in permanent conflicts and killing.
9. Algeria. The security of the State is threatened by fundamentalist groups associated with al-Qaeda. Airports, hotels and oil industry infrastructure of Algeria remain vulnerable targets for all kinds of terrorists.
10. Nigeria. In the most populous African country rich in oil criminal gangs are operating and rebels abduct locals and foreigners.

Despite the fact that the most dangerous countries in the world represent four continents, they all have one common characteristic – they once were European colonies. A share of the blame for the current unfavorable situation in certain countries can safely be passed onto their former colonial masters. They forced their will on them and showed a bad example to follow.
Somalia is dangerous both on land and on water. A war between the clans has been ongoing in the country since 1990. Army militants periodically rob people or kidnap them for ransom. On the water pirates are waiting for passing ships. Piracy is one of the many dangers in Somalia. Over the past year, pirates hijacked 42 ships. The situation in the country is chaotic. Since 1994, Somalia has changed 14 governments.
Afghanistan is a poor and undeveloped country. During the war with the Soviet Union 12 million mines were installed throughout the territory of the country that claim lives of thousands of people to this day. In addition, the country has a high probability of terrorist attacks that occur in Kabul and other cities. But Afghanistan is particularly dangerous for women. The country has a traditional of various forms of violence against females, poor health, and desperate poverty. There are numerous cases of domestic violence, female feticide and more. Women in Afghanistan have little to no economic rights, which is a threat to their lives and well-being.
Early last year, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime released a report saying that Brazil has become the world leader in terms of the absolute number of murders (43,909 a year). According to sociologists, per capita the country is on the third place in the world in terms of homicides (22.7 per 100,000 residents).
The first place in South America is taken by Venezuela (49), and the second by Colombia (33.4). The world leader in terms of the number of murders per capita is Honduras (82.1 per 100,000 population), followed by the El Salvador (66).
Colombia is also the cocaine capital of the world. 75 percent of cocaine is distributed by “Cali Cartel” and “Pablo Escobar” – paramilitary groups fighting with the local government.
As mentioned above, the UK has a certain responsibility for the situation in Somalia. Yet in Britain things are going very well. The International Institute for Peace and Economics conducted a study that showed that over the past 10 years murder rate and violence in the UK declined considerably more than in other Western European countries. For example, the most dangerous country in the Western Europe is Belgium with 1.7 murders per hundred thousand people.
In the UK the number of murders has decreased nearly by half. In 2012, the national average was recorded as one murder per 100,000 residents. The total number of crimes over the past decade has fallen by a quarter. The safest area in the UK is Norfolk (administrative district Broadland). Over the years the number of patients in the clinics in England and Wales affected by violence-related crimes decreased by 14 percent.
Representatives of the Institute of World Economy cite several reasons for the decline of crime in the UK, in particular, a significant improvement in the methods of investigation and search of criminals associated with the introduction of modern technology. Among other reasons are growth of average wages and reduction in the consumption of alcohol by the British.
Sergei Vasilenkov
Pravda.Ru
Read the original in Russian

Obama Budget Slashes Social Security, Medicare. Change you can believe in!

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34578.htm

By Andre Damon

April 11, 2013 “Information Clearing House” -”WSWS” – US President Barack Obama unveiled his budget proposal Wednesday, calling for a historic attack on Medicare and Social Security. The move, coming after the imposition of $ 1.4 trillion in spending cuts over the past two years, marks a new stage in the US ruling class’s offensive against the social rights of the population.

“I am willing to make tough choices that may not be popular within my own party, because there can be no sacred cows for either party,” Obama wrote in a letter to Congress included in the budget, referring to the move’s repudiation of the Democrats’ traditional association with the programs of the Great Society and New Deal.

The budget proposes to slash $ 400 billion from Medicare spending over ten years, and would introduce a new measure of the cost of living that would mean an effective cut of $ 130 billion from Social Security benefits during the same period.

Cuts to these programs are overwhelmingly unpopular, with a Pew Research poll finding earlier this year that 87 percent of the population is opposed to cuts in Social Security, while 82 percent oppose cuts in Medicare.

The budget proposal comes less than a week after a disastrous March jobs report, which showed the lowest jobs growth in nine months, with 496,000 people dropping out of the labor force last month. Obama’s budget does nothing to address the fact that four million people are soon to see their federal extended unemployment benefits slashed by 11 percent until at least October 1.

In a press conference Wednesday morning, Obama sought to downplay the attacks on Social Security and Medicare contained in the budget, seeking to palm off the socially regressive proposals as intended to defend “a rising, thriving middle class” through a “balanced and responsible” proposal.

In tacit recognition of the overwhelming unpopularity of attacks on Social Security, Obama made no mention of the program by name in his speech. Instead, he referred to these cuts indirectly, saying, “My budget does also contain the compromise I offered Speaker Boehner at the end of last year, including reforms championed by Republican leaders in Congress. And I don’t believe that all these ideas are optimal, but I’m willing to accept them as part of a compromise.”
Aside from cuts to Medicare and Social Security, the budget contains a myriad of right-wing proposals, including expanding “education reform,” tax breaks to manufacturers, and a regressive $ 1-per-pack tax increase on cigarettes.
The budget proposes to create an “Infrastructure Bank” that would “leverage private and public capital to support infrastructure projects,” and take “action to modernize and improve the efficiency of the Federal permitting process” for building projects, including pipelines—in other words, speed up such projects to the detriment of public health and worker safety.
Obama called for further deregulation and tax subsidies for US corporations, with Obama noting that the budget includes “initiatives to support manufacturing communities, including a new tax credit to strengthen their ability to attract investments and jobs. And it expands my Administration’s SelectUSA initiative to help draw businesses and investment from around the world to our shores.”
The introduction of a new measure of the cost of living, referred to as the “Chained CPI” will cut Social Security payments by $ 130 billion over ten years, as well as $ 35 billion from federal workers’ retirement benefits.
In addition to the sharp cuts to Medicare and Social Security, the budget proposes other benefit cuts, such as a measure that prevents disabled workers from collecting both unemployment and disability benefits at the same time, leading to a $ 1 billion benefit cut over 10 years.
The budget likewise forges ahead with the attack on public education, introducing competitive funding for high schools, and facilitating the phasing out of liberal arts programs and their replacement with curricula that “today’s employers seek to fill the jobs available right now and in the future.”
This policy also applies to colleges, with the budget including measures that would “ensure affordability and value are considered in determining which colleges receive certain types of Federal aid,” meaning that those that do not “reform” their curriculum to topics demanded by corporations would be defunded.
To offset the public impact of the right-wing policies being proposed, the budget includes token measures that stand little chance of being implemented. Among these is a “Preschool for All” initiative, funded with a measly $ 750 million in preschool development grants to the states. But even this proposal this would be paid for by a 94-cents-per-pack increase in the federal tax on cigarettes, which would overwhelmingly affect the poorest and most vulnerable section of society.
Even after the significant concessions made by Obama, the Republicans maintained their demands for more cuts. “It looks like there’s less than $ 600 billion worth of reduction in there—and that’s over a decade—all of it coming from tax increases. In other words, it’s not a serious plan. For the most part, just another left-wing wish list,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan likewise said that he is “disappointed by the president’s proposal because it merely ratifies the status quo.”
While Obama noted in his speech Wednesday that he has already met the Republicans “more than halfway,” it is clear that Obama’s budget represents merely the starting point of negotiations, and that the Administration will move even further to meet the Republicans’ demands.
While Obama has boasted that he has already implemented $ 2.5 trillion in deficit reduction, these cuts have up to this point avoided entitlement spending. Now, the ruling class, through the medium of the two big-business parties, is barreling ahead with their plans to gut the bedrock programs of the US social safety net. This drive inevitably puts the entire political system on a collision course with the demands of the population, and must lead to mass political upheavals.
Copyright © 1998-2013 World Socialist Web Site

….

My comment
….
Republicans let Democrats screw Americans only if Democrats let Republicans screw Americans. This they call , partisanship
Here is how it works: Republicans demand from Democrats social benefits cuts to American people, social benefits for which Americans paid for tens of years .In return, Republicans will aid Democrats in disarming Americans, creating Gulags and increasing Taxes.

Obama Budget Slashes Social Security, Medicare. Change you can believe in!

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34578.htm

By Andre Damon

April 11, 2013 “Information Clearing House” -”WSWS” – US President Barack Obama unveiled his budget proposal Wednesday, calling for a historic attack on Medicare and Social Security. The move, coming after the imposition of $ 1.4 trillion in spending cuts over the past two years, marks a new stage in the US ruling class’s offensive against the social rights of the population.

“I am willing to make tough choices that may not be popular within my own party, because there can be no sacred cows for either party,” Obama wrote in a letter to Congress included in the budget, referring to the move’s repudiation of the Democrats’ traditional association with the programs of the Great Society and New Deal.

The budget proposes to slash $ 400 billion from Medicare spending over ten years, and would introduce a new measure of the cost of living that would mean an effective cut of $ 130 billion from Social Security benefits during the same period.

Cuts to these programs are overwhelmingly unpopular, with a Pew Research poll finding earlier this year that 87 percent of the population is opposed to cuts in Social Security, while 82 percent oppose cuts in Medicare.

The budget proposal comes less than a week after a disastrous March jobs report, which showed the lowest jobs growth in nine months, with 496,000 people dropping out of the labor force last month. Obama’s budget does nothing to address the fact that four million people are soon to see their federal extended unemployment benefits slashed by 11 percent until at least October 1.

In a press conference Wednesday morning, Obama sought to downplay the attacks on Social Security and Medicare contained in the budget, seeking to palm off the socially regressive proposals as intended to defend “a rising, thriving middle class” through a “balanced and responsible” proposal.

In tacit recognition of the overwhelming unpopularity of attacks on Social Security, Obama made no mention of the program by name in his speech. Instead, he referred to these cuts indirectly, saying, “My budget does also contain the compromise I offered Speaker Boehner at the end of last year, including reforms championed by Republican leaders in Congress. And I don’t believe that all these ideas are optimal, but I’m willing to accept them as part of a compromise.”
Aside from cuts to Medicare and Social Security, the budget contains a myriad of right-wing proposals, including expanding “education reform,” tax breaks to manufacturers, and a regressive $ 1-per-pack tax increase on cigarettes.
The budget proposes to create an “Infrastructure Bank” that would “leverage private and public capital to support infrastructure projects,” and take “action to modernize and improve the efficiency of the Federal permitting process” for building projects, including pipelines—in other words, speed up such projects to the detriment of public health and worker safety.
Obama called for further deregulation and tax subsidies for US corporations, with Obama noting that the budget includes “initiatives to support manufacturing communities, including a new tax credit to strengthen their ability to attract investments and jobs. And it expands my Administration’s SelectUSA initiative to help draw businesses and investment from around the world to our shores.”
The introduction of a new measure of the cost of living, referred to as the “Chained CPI” will cut Social Security payments by $ 130 billion over ten years, as well as $ 35 billion from federal workers’ retirement benefits.
In addition to the sharp cuts to Medicare and Social Security, the budget proposes other benefit cuts, such as a measure that prevents disabled workers from collecting both unemployment and disability benefits at the same time, leading to a $ 1 billion benefit cut over 10 years.
The budget likewise forges ahead with the attack on public education, introducing competitive funding for high schools, and facilitating the phasing out of liberal arts programs and their replacement with curricula that “today’s employers seek to fill the jobs available right now and in the future.”
This policy also applies to colleges, with the budget including measures that would “ensure affordability and value are considered in determining which colleges receive certain types of Federal aid,” meaning that those that do not “reform” their curriculum to topics demanded by corporations would be defunded.
To offset the public impact of the right-wing policies being proposed, the budget includes token measures that stand little chance of being implemented. Among these is a “Preschool for All” initiative, funded with a measly $ 750 million in preschool development grants to the states. But even this proposal this would be paid for by a 94-cents-per-pack increase in the federal tax on cigarettes, which would overwhelmingly affect the poorest and most vulnerable section of society.
Even after the significant concessions made by Obama, the Republicans maintained their demands for more cuts. “It looks like there’s less than $ 600 billion worth of reduction in there—and that’s over a decade—all of it coming from tax increases. In other words, it’s not a serious plan. For the most part, just another left-wing wish list,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan likewise said that he is “disappointed by the president’s proposal because it merely ratifies the status quo.”
While Obama noted in his speech Wednesday that he has already met the Republicans “more than halfway,” it is clear that Obama’s budget represents merely the starting point of negotiations, and that the Administration will move even further to meet the Republicans’ demands.
While Obama has boasted that he has already implemented $ 2.5 trillion in deficit reduction, these cuts have up to this point avoided entitlement spending. Now, the ruling class, through the medium of the two big-business parties, is barreling ahead with their plans to gut the bedrock programs of the US social safety net. This drive inevitably puts the entire political system on a collision course with the demands of the population, and must lead to mass political upheavals.
Copyright © 1998-2013 World Socialist Web Site

….

My comment
….
Republicans let Democrats screw Americans only if Democrats let Republicans screw Americans. This they call , partisanship
Here is how it works: Republicans demand from Democrats social benefits cuts to American people, social benefits for which Americans paid for tens of years .In return, Republicans will aid Democrats in disarming Americans, creating Gulags and increasing Taxes.

Russia moves to criminalize Holocaust denial

http://rt.com/politics/denial-holocaust-criminalize-moves-russia-853/
Get short URL
Published time: March 26, 2013 12:44
Edited time: March 28, 2013 11:31

RIA Novosti / Iliya Pitalev
Share on Tumblr
Tags
Crime, History, Human rights, Law, Mass media, Russia
The Russian lower house has received a new bill suggesting up to five years in prison for publicly denying the Holocaust or portraying Nazis as heroes.
The sponsor of the bill is Boris Shpigel, an Upper House member who recently submitted his resignation after being elected president of international rights group ‘World without Nazism,’ as Russian laws do not allow senators to hold leading posts in foreign or international organizations.
The new bill suggests amending the Criminal Code article on inciting hatred or humiliation of human dignity. The current draft would criminalize the rehabilitation of Nazism, portraying Nazis or their aides as heroes, Holocaust denial and also humiliating the dignity of individuals or groups on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, language, background, religion or belonging to a social group. These offenses would be prosecuted if committed in public or in mass media.
The amendments would punish such crimes with fines ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 rubles (from $ 3,300 to $ 10,000), correctional labor for up to two years or, in severe cases, prison terms of up to two years. If the crime is committed through abuse of office or together with threats of violence, the fines are raised to 500,000 rubles (under $ 17,000) and a maximum prison term of five years.
Russian law mandates punishment for inciting racial and ethnic hatred, and Nazi movements are outlawed in the country. However, these norms have not been formalized into a single legislative act. Last May, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Russian-led Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) political bloc approved a model law aimed at countering the glorification of Nazism, prioritizing mandatory punishment for such crimes.
Russian law enforcement has also noted a rise in nationalist sentiment in society, and called for rapid approval of laws to combat this threat.

The CIS model law also suggested the establishment of a special body to counter the rehabilitation of Nazism, which would inform society about the problem and present annual reports. However, this provision was not included in the Russian bill.
….

Best comments:

Holocaust HollowHoax Holohoax as in holograph
http://rt.com/politics/denial-holocaust-criminalize-moves-russia-853/comments/

Also

How many years in jail one should get for denying that the 66 million of Russian Ukrainian Christians were murdered by Jews! …..The brave Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian writer who has been called the “Conscience of the 20th Century,” served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system. Today, he is hated by top-level Jews in America and around the world because he exposed the Jewish leadership of the genocide of 66 million Gulag victims. Victims were Russians Belorussian Ukrainian Polish Christians.
http://www.texemarrs.com/062004/soviet_gulag.htm

also

How many years in jail one should get for denying that Jews Starved to Death 10 million Ukrainian Christians
The killing of 10 million Christians by the Jewish Bolsheviks under Joseph Stalin 1932-1933 in Ukraine. These events are also known as Holodomor. The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомор, ‘Морити голодом’, literal translation Killing by hunger) was a jew-made famine in the Ukrainian SSR between 1932 and 1933.
http://undergrounddocumentaries.com/holodomor-the-ukrainian-holocaust-of-1933/
http://www.garethjones.org/soviet_articles/thomas_walker/muss_russland_hungern.htm

How many years in jail one should get for denying that the British Americans and Jews committed Dresden Holocaust (February 13/14 1945)
http://rense.com/general19/flame.htm
Approximately 500.000 children, women, the elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were slaughtered in one night. They burned alive!

also
How many years in jail one should get for denying that Jew USA Holocausted 7.1 million of Iraqis….
http://iraqigenocideiraqiholocaust.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
This site is an Alphabetical Compendium of authoritative, humane statements informing people about the ongoing, US Alliance-imposed Iraqi Holocaust and Iraqi Genocide that as of December 2010 was associated with post-1990 and post-2003 violent and non-violent avoidable deaths totaling 4.5 million and 2.6 million, respectively, and refugees totaling 5-6 million –

Also

Official Red Cross Records Show Holocaust Was a Fraud..271 K folks died of all nations mostly Slavs
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=67371
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/03/official-red-cross-records-show-holocaust-was-a-fraud-2449344.html

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/480635_623885157638409_75479213_n.jpg

Look at this Plaques –Poles revised the holocaust numbers from 4 millions to 1.5 in 1989! Exposing the lie!
http://rense.com/1.imagesH/Auch_dees.jpg

The Holocaust Hoax is exposed in “Auschwitz – The Final Count” http://rense.com/general62/aauc.htm

also

The Title of your article is misleading. It should read: Jew Shpigel demands that Russia Jails anyone who questions Historical Events for 5 years. One of them was alleged Holocaust of Jews by Germans.

So Jewish Blood Sucking Parasites are after Russia now -: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=663

Secretary of state Madeleine Albright, a Jew, says 500 000 dead Iraqi Children was “worth it”!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE

Jewish Problem is serious PROBLEM
If you go into a bar and get your tail whipped, maybe the people in the bar were wrong; but if you go into 10 bars in one night and get beat down in every single one of them, chances are that it isn’t them, it’s you. If the jews had only been expelled from one country, they could possibly get away with convincing the world that they had been terribly wronged. Unfortunately for them, the fact is that jews have been thrown out of nearly every civilised nation on the planet (and a few un civilised ones). Even Egyptians kicked them out! The Moses story was basically a pogrom

H ere two videos of prominent historical revisionists, do these people look like the skinheads and neonazi media portrays them to be ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx9G4zmpKv0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmd w

Russia moves to criminalize Holocaust denial

http://rt.com/politics/denial-holocaust-criminalize-moves-russia-853/
Get short URL
Published time: March 26, 2013 12:44
Edited time: March 28, 2013 11:31

RIA Novosti / Iliya Pitalev
Share on Tumblr
Tags
Crime, History, Human rights, Law, Mass media, Russia
The Russian lower house has received a new bill suggesting up to five years in prison for publicly denying the Holocaust or portraying Nazis as heroes.
The sponsor of the bill is Boris Shpigel, an Upper House member who recently submitted his resignation after being elected president of international rights group ‘World without Nazism,’ as Russian laws do not allow senators to hold leading posts in foreign or international organizations.
The new bill suggests amending the Criminal Code article on inciting hatred or humiliation of human dignity. The current draft would criminalize the rehabilitation of Nazism, portraying Nazis or their aides as heroes, Holocaust denial and also humiliating the dignity of individuals or groups on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, language, background, religion or belonging to a social group. These offenses would be prosecuted if committed in public or in mass media.
The amendments would punish such crimes with fines ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 rubles (from $ 3,300 to $ 10,000), correctional labor for up to two years or, in severe cases, prison terms of up to two years. If the crime is committed through abuse of office or together with threats of violence, the fines are raised to 500,000 rubles (under $ 17,000) and a maximum prison term of five years.
Russian law mandates punishment for inciting racial and ethnic hatred, and Nazi movements are outlawed in the country. However, these norms have not been formalized into a single legislative act. Last May, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Russian-led Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) political bloc approved a model law aimed at countering the glorification of Nazism, prioritizing mandatory punishment for such crimes.
Russian law enforcement has also noted a rise in nationalist sentiment in society, and called for rapid approval of laws to combat this threat.

The CIS model law also suggested the establishment of a special body to counter the rehabilitation of Nazism, which would inform society about the problem and present annual reports. However, this provision was not included in the Russian bill.
….

Best comments:

Holocaust HollowHoax Holohoax as in holograph
http://rt.com/politics/denial-holocaust-criminalize-moves-russia-853/comments/

Also

How many years in jail one should get for denying that the 66 million of Russian Ukrainian Christians were murdered by Jews! …..The brave Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian writer who has been called the “Conscience of the 20th Century,” served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system. Today, he is hated by top-level Jews in America and around the world because he exposed the Jewish leadership of the genocide of 66 million Gulag victims. Victims were Russians Belorussian Ukrainian Polish Christians.
http://www.texemarrs.com/062004/soviet_gulag.htm

also

How many years in jail one should get for denying that Jews Starved to Death 10 million Ukrainian Christians
The killing of 10 million Christians by the Jewish Bolsheviks under Joseph Stalin 1932-1933 in Ukraine. These events are also known as Holodomor. The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомор, ‘Морити голодом’, literal translation Killing by hunger) was a jew-made famine in the Ukrainian SSR between 1932 and 1933.
http://undergrounddocumentaries.com/holodomor-the-ukrainian-holocaust-of-1933/
http://www.garethjones.org/soviet_articles/thomas_walker/muss_russland_hungern.htm

How many years in jail one should get for denying that the British Americans and Jews committed Dresden Holocaust (February 13/14 1945)
http://rense.com/general19/flame.htm
Approximately 500.000 children, women, the elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were slaughtered in one night. They burned alive!

also
How many years in jail one should get for denying that Jew USA Holocausted 7.1 million of Iraqis….
http://iraqigenocideiraqiholocaust.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
This site is an Alphabetical Compendium of authoritative, humane statements informing people about the ongoing, US Alliance-imposed Iraqi Holocaust and Iraqi Genocide that as of December 2010 was associated with post-1990 and post-2003 violent and non-violent avoidable deaths totaling 4.5 million and 2.6 million, respectively, and refugees totaling 5-6 million –

Also

Official Red Cross Records Show Holocaust Was a Fraud..271 K folks died of all nations mostly Slavs
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=67371
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/03/official-red-cross-records-show-holocaust-was-a-fraud-2449344.html

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/480635_623885157638409_75479213_n.jpg

Look at this Plaques –Poles revised the holocaust numbers from 4 millions to 1.5 in 1989! Exposing the lie!
http://rense.com/1.imagesH/Auch_dees.jpg

The Holocaust Hoax is exposed in “Auschwitz – The Final Count” http://rense.com/general62/aauc.htm

also

The Title of your article is misleading. It should read: Jew Shpigel demands that Russia Jails anyone who questions Historical Events for 5 years. One of them was alleged Holocaust of Jews by Germans.

So Jewish Blood Sucking Parasites are after Russia now -: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=663

Secretary of state Madeleine Albright, a Jew, says 500 000 dead Iraqi Children was “worth it”!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE

Jewish Problem is serious PROBLEM
If you go into a bar and get your tail whipped, maybe the people in the bar were wrong; but if you go into 10 bars in one night and get beat down in every single one of them, chances are that it isn’t them, it’s you. If the jews had only been expelled from one country, they could possibly get away with convincing the world that they had been terribly wronged. Unfortunately for them, the fact is that jews have been thrown out of nearly every civilised nation on the planet (and a few un civilised ones). Even Egyptians kicked them out! The Moses story was basically a pogrom

H ere two videos of prominent historical revisionists, do these people look like the skinheads and neonazi media portrays them to be ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx9G4zmpKv0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmd w

Obama, the Black White House Whining Monkey, Promises War with Iran “Within One Year”. Change, U can believe in!
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=38861

Administrator Mar 15, 2013 |

The Zionist Supremacist controlled puppet American president Barack Obama has intimated that he will order an attack on Iran within a year “should diplomatic efforts fail” to prevent Iran from allegedly obtaining an “atom bomb.”

Obama made the remark during an interview on Israel’s Channel 2, ahead of his visit to Israel.

What this means is that a war with Iran is now almost inevitable, because that nation is not developing an atom bomb at all—as all intelligence reports have already confirmed many times over.

For Obama and his Zionist controllers to demand a “diplomatic solution” to a problem which does not even exist, is nothing but a blind and an excuse to wage war against the Iranians.

It is impossible to reach a “diplomatic” solution to the mythical “Iranian atom bomb” and the lack of progress which must inevitably result from such nonsense will then be presented to the American public via the Jewish-Supremacist controlled mass media as the “reason” for a new catastrophic and costly war in the Middle East—all to save Israel once again.
In the interview with Channel 2, Obama claimed that Iran could “produce a nuclear weapon in just over a year.”

This outrageous claim is obviously just his Zionist wire pullers speaking, as the US National Intelligence Director James Clapper told a Senate panel during an annual report on global threats on Tuesday this week that Teheran had decided not to build an atom bomb.

Clapper further said “we do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.”
His assessment reiterated last year’s analysis from intelligence agencies stating “Iran’s nuclear decision-making is guided by a cost-benefit approach” which had subsequently precluded efforts to build a bomb.
“…We have not changed our assessment that Iran prefers to avoid direct confrontation with the United States because regime preservation is its top priority,” Clapper said.
Obama’s claims are therefore a straight forward lie, and he is simply echoing what the Jewish Supremacist warmongers who seek yet another war, have told him to say.
Obama went on to say that “should diplomatic efforts fail this year or early next year, America will be forced to carry out military action against Iran.”
Obama said that Washington was in ”constant coordination with the Israeli government” concerning Iran and a variety of other issues, and that he is in close consultation with Netanyahu — to whom he consistently referred by his informal moniker, “Bibi.” He said the two have a “terrific, businesslike relationship.”

Obama administration is providing the Syrian opposition with $ 114 million in aid. Change you can believe in!
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/ambassador-us-providing-114-million-in-aid-to-syrian-rebels/

Rate This

thehill.com
The Obama administration is providing the Syrian opposition with $ 114 million in aid, more than previously revealed, to help topple Bashar Assad, U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford told Congress on Wednesday.

Ford briefed House appropriators in a closed-door hearing following Secretary of State John Kerry’s announcement last month that America would provide $ 60 million in direct food and medicine assistance to the Syrian Opposition Coalition. The aid, Ford said, is in addition to $ 54 million in communications gear and other aid already offered to “disparate Syrian opposition groups across the country to build a network of ethnically and religiously diverse civilian activists.”
“Preserving national unity and laying the foundation for a free Syria that respects the rights of all its citizens is essential if we are to secure a Syria that helps rather than threatens stability in the heart of the Middle East,” Ford told the committee, according to his opening statement, which was obtained by The Hill. “Collapse and fragmentation of the Syrian state or its takeover by extremists would worsen the risks associated with chemical weapons security, terrorist bases, and new refugee flows inundating neighboring states. Those outcomes would directly threaten our interests.”
He said the State Department would create a small grants initiative the Syrian Opposition Council would use to help local councils meet the needs of their citizens, including “supporting the work of these new governing institutions and helping them undertake service delivery projects for their communities.” And the U.S. Agency for International Development will create two programs designed to have “immediate impact”: One to provide short-term assistance for urgent needs, such as fuel, heaters, and nutritional and educational supplies for children; the other, to support strategic, longer-term needs such as repairing schools, local power, and sanitation.
“The membership is very concerned and the ambassador was very straightforward in what he had to say,” said Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas), the chairwoman of the Appropriations subcommittee on foreign operations. “A lot of questions, there aren’t answers to yet because we don’t know the end-game.”
Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) said he pressed for answers about the White House’s decision to override last summer’s recommendations from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to arm the rebels.
“Those are the concerns I had,” he said.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who represents a number of Syrian-Americans, has pressed the Department of Homeland Security to grant emergency temporary visas to the nearly nearly six thousand Syrian nationals with approved immigrant petitions.
“We’re trying to be as aggressive as we can without taking the risk that the assistance we give could be used against us down the road,” he said. “We continue to probe on the best way to assist the opposition.”

Obama approved legislation that will accelerate the use of domestic surveillance drones within the USA. Change U Can Believe In!

FAA takes major step in expanding drone use in America
http://rt.com/usa/news/faa-drone-aircraft-us-335/

Published: 15 February, 2013, 22:09
TAGS:
USA, Planes, Security

RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (Reuters)

US President Barack Obama has approved legislation that is expected to immediately accelerate the use of domestic surveillance drones within the United States.

On Thursday, Pres. Obama signed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, a bill that the Federal Aviation Administration’s AnneMarie Ternay describes as containing requirements for integrating unmanned aircraft systems and vehicles such as drones into the national airspace starting immediately.

With the president’s approval this week, the FAA has already begun soliciting proposals from cities across the country that are interested in becoming one of six soon-to-be established test sites where drones and UAVs will be sent into the sky as America takes the next step towards accepting the latest generation of aircraft.

The FAA says that locations in over 30 states have already showed interest in the program. Soon the agency will be tasked with picking a mere half-dozen locations so that drones can formally be introduced into official US airspace and not just strips of sky above designated areas.

Should the FAA stay on schedule, drones are likely to start flying regularly in the US by late 2015, and as many as 30,000 non-military UAVs are expected to be in the sky by the end of the decade. First, however, the FAA, drone builders and pilots will have to pick test sites to work out the kinks of a controversial aircraft.

“We expect to learn how unmanned aircraft systems operate in different environments and how they will impact air traffic operations,” FAA Chief Michael Huerta says in a statement obtained by the Associated Press. “The test sites will inform the agency as we develop standards for certifying unmanned aircraft and determine necessary air traffic requirements.”

“This research will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation’s skies,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood added to the AP.

Earlier in the week, the head of the FAA’s new drone department spoke at a convention outside of Washington, DC to discuss some concerns Americans have voiced en masse lately about bringing drones to inside of America’s borders. The US Department of Homeland Security already has an arsenal of the aircraft at its disposal for use in border-patrol missions, but small-time law enforcement agencies and other federal, state and educational institutions hope to have drones of their in the near future. So far, the FAA has received at least 81 applications from entities wishing to obtain drone licenses, including police departments and universities. What exactly law enforcement could do with a drone has some Americans concerns, though, an issue that was addressed at this week’s conference.

“We currently have rules in the books that deal with releasing anything from an aircraft, period. Those rules are in place and that would prohibit weapons from being installed on a civil aircraft,” Jim Williams of the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration Office said this week.
On the same day that President Obama signed off on the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, around 150 people from Oakland, California attended an Alameda County meeting to weigh in on demands from figures there to put drones in the sky.
“We oppose the use of public resources to buy machines to surveil its citizens,” said Michael Seigel, a member of Alameda County Against Drones, according to Wired’s Danger Room.
Earlier in the week, the FAA’s Mr. Williams dismissed those concerns, saying, “The FAA has no authority to make rules or enforce any rules relative to privacy.”
“We can ask the industry to take into consideration the privacy issue. … There aren’t any rules to date on that.”

Obama approved legislation that will accelerate the use of domestic surveillance drones within the USA. Change U Can Believe In!

FAA takes major step in expanding drone use in America
http://rt.com/usa/news/faa-drone-aircraft-us-335/

Published: 15 February, 2013, 22:09
TAGS:
USA, Planes, Security

RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (Reuters)

US President Barack Obama has approved legislation that is expected to immediately accelerate the use of domestic surveillance drones within the United States.

On Thursday, Pres. Obama signed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, a bill that the Federal Aviation Administration’s AnneMarie Ternay describes as containing requirements for integrating unmanned aircraft systems and vehicles such as drones into the national airspace starting immediately.

With the president’s approval this week, the FAA has already begun soliciting proposals from cities across the country that are interested in becoming one of six soon-to-be established test sites where drones and UAVs will be sent into the sky as America takes the next step towards accepting the latest generation of aircraft.

The FAA says that locations in over 30 states have already showed interest in the program. Soon the agency will be tasked with picking a mere half-dozen locations so that drones can formally be introduced into official US airspace and not just strips of sky above designated areas.

Should the FAA stay on schedule, drones are likely to start flying regularly in the US by late 2015, and as many as 30,000 non-military UAVs are expected to be in the sky by the end of the decade. First, however, the FAA, drone builders and pilots will have to pick test sites to work out the kinks of a controversial aircraft.

“We expect to learn how unmanned aircraft systems operate in different environments and how they will impact air traffic operations,” FAA Chief Michael Huerta says in a statement obtained by the Associated Press. “The test sites will inform the agency as we develop standards for certifying unmanned aircraft and determine necessary air traffic requirements.”

“This research will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation’s skies,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood added to the AP.

Earlier in the week, the head of the FAA’s new drone department spoke at a convention outside of Washington, DC to discuss some concerns Americans have voiced en masse lately about bringing drones to inside of America’s borders. The US Department of Homeland Security already has an arsenal of the aircraft at its disposal for use in border-patrol missions, but small-time law enforcement agencies and other federal, state and educational institutions hope to have drones of their in the near future. So far, the FAA has received at least 81 applications from entities wishing to obtain drone licenses, including police departments and universities. What exactly law enforcement could do with a drone has some Americans concerns, though, an issue that was addressed at this week’s conference.

“We currently have rules in the books that deal with releasing anything from an aircraft, period. Those rules are in place and that would prohibit weapons from being installed on a civil aircraft,” Jim Williams of the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration Office said this week.
On the same day that President Obama signed off on the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, around 150 people from Oakland, California attended an Alameda County meeting to weigh in on demands from figures there to put drones in the sky.
“We oppose the use of public resources to buy machines to surveil its citizens,” said Michael Seigel, a member of Alameda County Against Drones, according to Wired’s Danger Room.
Earlier in the week, the FAA’s Mr. Williams dismissed those concerns, saying, “The FAA has no authority to make rules or enforce any rules relative to privacy.”
“We can ask the industry to take into consideration the privacy issue. … There aren’t any rules to date on that.”

Baboon to use predator drones against American journalists, freedom activists and critics of government. Change you can Believe in!

Read his famous speech: “ I have a drone that one day….bla bla bla” …or was that “I have a dream that one day…blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bla”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039046_military_drones_American_citizens_murder.html#ixzz2Kd628c2T

Monday, February 11, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039046_military_drones_American_citizens_murder.html#ixzz2Kd5x5lZz

http://www.naturalnews.com/039046_military_drones_American_citizens_murder.html
President Obama plans to use military drones in the skies over the United States to assassinate journalists, patriots and critics of his administration. That’s the inescapable conclusion from the emerging pattern of evidence now publicly available — keep reading for details.

Front and center in this pattern of evidence is the 16-page memo that was just released by Obama’s lawyers in the Department of Justice. This memo puts forth a “legal justification” for the President to order the drone assassination of any American citizen he names — anytime, anywhere, for any reason. This new power claimed by the President has no basis in federal law or the Constitution. It is an invented power of absolute tyranny that puts the power to decide who lives and who dies in the hands of one man. This document essentially legalizes the President acting as a serial murderer.

It is claimed that the purpose of this new power to simply name any American the President doesn’t like and immediately have them struck by a Hellfire missile launched from a drone is designed to “protect America.” Yet the 16-page memo that claims to justify all this was intentionally written to include Americans on U.S. soil as potential targets.

As Judge Andrew Napolitano explained just a few days ago on Fox News:

“This 16-page white paper is written so vaguely that the logic from it could… permit the President to kill Americans here in the United States.”

That’s the whole point, actually. If Americans on U.S. soil were to be excluded from such drone assassinations, such language would have been made readily apparent in the memo. But no such language is found in the memo. In fact, the tone of the document quite clearly states that the President has the authority to order drone killings of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world, under any circumstances.

This legal manipulation even has U.S. Senators worried. Democrat Senator Patrick J Leahy and Senator Charles Grassley sent a letter to Obama on Friday, stating, “The deliberate killing of a United States citizen pursuant to a targeted operation authorized or aided by our government raises significant constitutional and legal concerns.”

That’s the understatement of the year.

U.S. Senators are trying to create an “oversight committee” so that a few of them are part of the illegal, unconstitutional decision process of which Americans the U.S. government should murder next. As Kurt Nimmo reports with InfoWars.com:

Feinstein has proposed “legislation to ensure that drone strikes are carried out in a manner consistent with our values, and the proposal to create an analogue of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to review the conduct of such strikes,” in other words a secret tribunal that will hand down kill orders for Americans the government believes are “suspected militants.”

If drones are to be unleashed under the values of Feinstein — an outright traitor to the nation and a serial violator of the U.S. Constitution — then God help us all. Remember, Feinstein is the Senator who has already said she wants all Americans to turn all their guns in. She literally wants the entire U.S. civilian population disarmed so that government has all the weapons, including drones which Feinstein wants flying over U.S. cities, ready to strike named American citizens at any moment.
The American “battlefield” doctrine and the NDAA
In defending the drone assassination powers of the President, you might hear language used that says drones will “only be used on the battlefield.” That seems to imply they will only be used in the Middle East, right?

Wrong. The USA has been legally defined as the new “battlefield” by the NDAA. That’s the National Defense Authorization Act which also allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens without trial, without legal representation and even without them ever being charged.

The USA is the new “battlefield,” and when you combine the NDAA and the DOJ’s new drone killing justification memo, you now have the claimed legal framework for any American on U.S. soil to be arrested, detained, tortured or blown to bits without warning and without even a single shred of evidence being presented against him.

Yes, this is America today. Right now. You are living under a military dictatorship and most of you don’t even realize it yet. Even liberals and progressives are starting to wake up to Obama’s tyranny, by the way. On Democracy Now, Daniel Ellsberg recently described Obama’s actions as a “systematic assault on the Constitution.”
Who are the terrorists?
Of course, anyone who raises these points will be immediately dismissed with the claim that all this new power in the hands of the President will only be used “against terrorists.”

Okay, then who are the terrorists, exactly? It turns out they are YOU!

As Judge Napolitano recently explained:

The Janet Napolitano DHS memorandum said that people who are pro-life, people who believe in the right to keep and bear arms, returning veterans, people who think the government is too big and the IRS is too powerful, could be characterized as domestic terrorists. That could characterize two-thirds of the country. (Click here to see related video.)

Another DHS report named as terrorists anyone who opposes illegal immigration, abortion or federal taxes.
The pieces of the puzzle
So now it all becomes clear:

1) The NDAA legalized the federal government arresting, detaining and torturing American citizens if they were classified as “terrorists.”

2) The DOJ drone-killing memo legalized the President murdering anyone he names by simply claiming they might be associated with “terrorists.”

3) The DHS announces that anyone who isn’t an absolutely Big Government boot-licker and Obama worshipper IS A TERRORIST.

And there you have it: The full circle of justification to use military drone strikes against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. Simply call them terrorists, and the rest of the legal framework backs you up.

I repeat: All that is necessary to justify the murder of American citizens without trial is labeling them “terrorists” even with no evidence to support such a claim. The drone killings require no evidence. They only require the signature of one man.
Who is likely on the drone strike target list in the USA
So who is most likely to be assassinated by President Obama once drone strikes are fully unleashed in the USA?

• Journalists.
• Political opponents.
• Anti-government protesters. (One Hellfire missile takes ‘em all out.)
• Online activists.
• Veterans.
• Gun owners and gun shops.
• Constitutionalists and libertarians.

Drone strikes are completely silent because the Hellfire missiles arrive faster than the speed of sound. You don’t even hear the missile until after the explosion. The blast radius of a Hellfire missile is 15 – 20 meters, and everything inside that radius is completely obliterated. This is more than enough to destroy entire homes, apartments and office buildings, not to mention vehicles and even light bunkers.

World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah actually voiced his concern about Obama being reelected, saying that he believed Obama would “kill journalists” if he won a second term. Farah is not being paranoid. He’s right on the money with where this is going. Click here to read his article published right before the 2012 election.
Drones are weapons of tyranny
In the history of America, rifles are the weapons of liberty, and in any war limited to just rifles and similar weapons, the People will always achieve victory over tyranny.

But tyrannies tend to rise up when specialized, highly-complex weapons come onto the scene, creating an imbalance of military power that suppresses the People. Drones are that new weapon: There is virtually no citizen defense against drones, and drones can strike targets anyone in the country with zero warning. You do not get called to appear in court, you do not get arrested, and you do not receive a warning. You’re simply murdered by the U.S. President without warning and without a trial. That’s the new America.

The cover story: Drone strikes that actually take out the homes of Obama’s political enemies can even be explained away as “bombings” using conventional explosives. A convenient cover story can keep drones out of the news, even while drone strikes are taking out journalists, activists and critics of the criminal Obama regime.

You might wonder, then, what is the strategy for defending against drones? It all comes down to men with rifles raiding drone airfields and taking them over. Once again, rifles become the single most important tool of resistance in the face of tyranny, which is exactly why the government is right now desperately seeking to register and confiscate all rifles in the hands of U.S. citizens. The MQ-1C Warrior drone has an operational range of 675 miles, meaning that drone airfields must be relatively close to intended targets. The airfields are the weak link, and this is what Americans must take back if drone mass murder is unleashed against American citizens (by any president, now or in the future).

There are also some high-tech defenses against drones. Iran appears to have hacked a drone by feeding it false GPS signals, guiding it to land on an Iranian runway where it was then taken into custody by the government there. This sort of GPS hacking appears to be relatively simple to accomplish, but the technique has never been proven in an actual military conflict.

Another defense against drones is to stay on the move. Don’t hole up in fixed locations for long periods of time. Drone strikes are only effective if the intended target’s location is known with certainty. In a resistance war against a tyrannical government, resistance forces will of course remain very mobile and unpredictable in their locations and movements. This will cause the government to waste lots of Hellfire missiles blowing up empty houses and likely killing the wrong people.

Every drone strike against U.S. targets will, of course, enrage the population even further, resulting in yet another mass wave of recruitment into the resistance. The more Americans Obama (or another president) kills with drones, the more powerful the resistance becomes. This spiral continues until there is either a violent armed overthrow of the government or the entire resistance movement is mass murdered by the government itself. In the case of the latter, that’s how we end up with Hitler, Stalin, Mao and other dictatorial tyrants who assume power in the aftermath of blood running in the streets.
Stop being so naive — this is happening NOW!
If you think any of this seems outlandish, you aren’t paying attention. The 16-page drone assassination memo has already been published. The NDAA is federal law. The DHS memos are real. All of us who question government, who own firearms, and who believe in the Bill of Rights have already been named terrorists.

The stage is being set to wage an all-out war with the American people. That’s the reason DHS has purchased 1.6 billion rounds of ammo. It’s the reason DHS is buying 7,000 full-auto assault rifles. All these weapons and ammo are for exclusive use inside the United States of America, on U.S. soil.

This is why thousands of bulletproof roadside checkpoints have been purchased by DHS. It’s why steel cable dividers are being installed on highways, so that you can’t turn around when approaching a TSA checkpoint. This is why talk of shooting gun owners is openly tolerated and even encouraged in the mainstream media and on social networks.

We are witnessing a full-on ramping up toward total war with the American people. This war will be caused (false-flagged) by the government itself, and it will be waged on U.S. soil, using drone assassinations, nationwide gun confiscation, FEMA camps and of course a declaration of Martial Law to justify it all.

The end game is a complete takeover of America by socialist / communist / fascist forces and the outright abolition of liberties and firearms in the hands of citizens. America is scheduled for termination, and people like Obama have been placed in power precisely because he can fool enough people for a sufficient amount of time to get this plan underway without popular resistance. Obama is seductive and hypnotic, so his followers will think he’s helping America even while he’s actually destroying it by design.

Drones are terminators in the sky, controlled by one man — a tyrant who sits in the Oval Office and respects no boundaries of either the Constitution or federal law. He makes law up as he goes along, betraying his oath of office and violating the very tenants of justice upon which this country was founded.

Obama is a traitor to America and a danger to us all. For the sake of America’s future, he must be impeached, thrown out of office and replaced with a President who actually upholds the Constitution and respects the laws of the land.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/2/5/daniel_ellsberg_ndaa_indefinite_…
http://www.infowars.com/it-has-happened-here/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwJb5pbWhe4
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-2nd-term-war-on-domestic-opposition…
Stay informed! FREE subscription to the Health Ranger’s email newsletter
Get breaking news alerts on GMOs, fluoride, superfoods, natural cures and more…
Join over four million monthly readers. Email privacy 100% protected. Unsubscribe at any time.

Articles Related to This Article:
• The new rules of imperialism: Economic warfare, consumer products and disease exports

• Culture Shock: The USA vs. South America; Fiction vs. Reality

• Why America is still a great place to live: thirteen things I love about this country

• Why Michael Moore’s SiCKO is a health care documentary every American must see

• Gore warns Americans over Bush lawlessness, tyranny

• Diabetes and Hispanic Americans: more than just genetics

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039046_military_drones_American_citizens_murder.html#ixzz2Kd5Y1U4C