Iraqi Dinar News

Trade Iraqi Dinar

Posts tagged: Enemy

Americans: Obama’s “Greatest Friend” Israel is America’s Greatest Enemy

By , March 24, 2013 2:01 am

Americans: Obama’s “Greatest Friend” Israel is America’s Greatest Enemy
By: Bulov on: 24.03.2013 [01:50 ] (60 reads)

Obama’s “Greatest Friend” Israel is America’s Greatest Enemy
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=38924
Administrator Mar 21, 2013 |

President Barack Obama’s statement that Israel is America’s greatest friend is an outrageous and cynical lie—because almost no other nation on earth has committed such monstrous treason against a “friend” than Israel.

From the creation of the Zionist state, Israel has spied upon, tricked and even physically attacked America and Americans.

Perhaps one of the most dramatic examples of this Israeli treason came when Israel awarded medals to the Zionist agents who made terrorist attacks against American sites in Egypt hoping to provoke an American war with Egypt.

In ceremonies reported by the major Israeli daily newspaper, Haaretz, Israeli President Moshe Katsav stated the following at a ceremony honoring the Jewish terrorists who attacked American facilities:

“Although it is still a sensitive situation, we decided now to express our respect for these heroes,” President Moshe Katzav said after presenting the three surviving members of the bomber ring with certificates of appreciation at a Jerusalem ceremony.

In the Lavon Affair, named for the Israeli Defense Minister at the time, Pinhas Lavon, the Israeli government launched a false flag, terrorist operation against American sites in Egypt hoping to provoke American bombing, retaliation and war against that nation.

The Israeli terrorists targeted American sites such as American Cinemas and American libraries around Cairo. Only the premature detonation of one of the Jewish terrorist’s bombs led to the exposure and halt of the plot before the extensive loss of life and property.

If this terrorist operation would have been successful, not only would it have cost many American lives, it would have launched an American war against an innocent nation which in turn would have caused the death of many thousands of innocent American and Egyptian lives as well as untold billions of dollars.

Israel’s terrorist plot against the United States in the Lavon Affair was one greatest acts of treachery that any nation has ever committed against an ongoing ally.

Shockingly, this was only the first Israeli act of treachery against the nation that stood by Israel more than any other: America. There have repeated acts of Israeli terrorism and treachery against the United States of America.

In 1967, Israel attacked the USS Liberty with both fighter jets and torpedo boats in a surprise terrorist attack that killed 34 Americans and wounded 173.

Both the U.S. Secretary of State at the time, Dean Rusk, and the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Thomas Moorer, both have stated that it was a pre-meditated attack against the United States.

In the Jonathan Pollard case, an Israeli spy devastated America’s Eastern European Intelligence Network, and Israel honors Pollard today as a hero and lobbies for his release from American prison.
Important figures in the Israeli lobby AIPAC, the most powerful lobby in Washington, D.C., have been extensively investigated by the FBI for spying against the United States.

These facts should obviously be a huge story in America’s press, but it is suppressed in the Jewish dominated American media.

Israeli Terrorism Against America

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvItZ2GS88A&feature=player_embedded

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!

By , February 2, 2013 9:04 pm

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!
By: Bulov on: 02.02.2013 [07:51 ] (80 reads)

Feinstein The Enemy Of America
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=792

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!

Jewish Agenda Articles
B/C 500

A NEW BENEDICT ARNOLD is now defacing the Constitutional order of liberty in American life and her name is Diane Feinstein.
With her devilish mission to strip the Goys of their guns—(she wants MORE than just “assault weapons” BANNED)—Dianne Feinstein has to be the MOST HATED woman in America today. And she just happens to be a Jew.
But does it really matter that Feinstein is a Jew?” Yes it does.
First of all, American Jewry is getting very nervous that a JEW is leading the attack on America’s most cherished possession affirmed by the Second Amendment, the right of personal sovereignty.
One Jewish group in particular, Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership, fears a backlash against American Jewry owing to the anti-gun lobbying of several national Jewish organizations.
Rabbi Aaron Zelman, founder of JPFO, puts it this way:
“By working to destroy the Bill of Rights, Jewish Groups are fanning the flames of anti-Semitism.
“A lot of Americans resent these people who trample on our fundamental rights.” View Entire Story Here.
But what is even more likely to “fan the flames” of anti-Semitism is due to the high number of HIGH PROFILE JEWS now at the forefront of trampling on the Second Amendment.
Abe Foxman’s mission to prevent a backlash against Jews is bound to fail when JEWISH NAMES like Feinstein, Blumenthal, Cardin, Wasserman-Shultz, Schumer, Israel, Boxer, Lautenberg, Bloomberg, are LEADING THE CHARGE to STRIP Americans of their guns.
It’s really a matter of personal ownership—(which underlies the right to bear arms in order to defend oneself and family)—that is at stake here.
And Dianne Feinstein, a Jew, is hell-bent on seizing ownership of every American citizen’s particular and personal individual body.

FEINSTEIN WANTS YOUR BODY
DO AMERICANS WANT TO BE OWNED by Dianne Feinstein?
Do Americans want to be owned by Jews?
Do Americans want a Jew like Feinstein and her ilk to tell them what they are allowed and not allowed to do with their OWN BODIES?
Do Americans who possess “grandfathered” weapons want the Jew Feinstein to preside over them being investigated, photographed, and fingerprinted…their firearms registered with local, state, and federal authorities by type and serial number?
For this is EXACTLY what this freedom-hating Jew Feinstein is pushing with her new piece of legislation.

WHAT GIVES FEINSTEIN THE RIGHT to moralize over Americans who work for a living when she herself is nothing but a contemptible parasite feeding off taxpayers’ hard-earned money for the entirety of her life and career?
Who gave this Jew the license to tell Gentiles what they can or cannot buy when she herself has enriched herself with a net worth of $ 108 million through insider trading due to being privy to companies about to receive large grants from Congress?
What gives Feinstein the right to deny families their inalienable right to arm and defend themselves when she herself has been legislating for homosexuality, lesbianism, and transgenderism, all of which militates against the preservation of the family?
Is it any wonder then that Dianne Feinstein is the MOST HATED woman in America today?
Would it be any surprise if Feinstein’s gun grab provokes a backlash against Jewry?
Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America?

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@yahoo.com
___

For More See: Jews Lead Gun Control Charge Click Here
And: What Really Happened At Sandy Hook? Click Here
And: Why The Jews Want Your Guns Click Here
And: Jewry’s Plan For Universal Background Checks Click Here

Brother Nathanael @ January 31, 2013

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!

By , February 2, 2013 9:04 pm

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!
By: Bulov on: 02.02.2013 [07:51 ] (80 reads)

Feinstein The Enemy Of America
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=792

Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America? “ Oh, those stupid goys” jew Feinstein laughs!

Jewish Agenda Articles
B/C 500

A NEW BENEDICT ARNOLD is now defacing the Constitutional order of liberty in American life and her name is Diane Feinstein.
With her devilish mission to strip the Goys of their guns—(she wants MORE than just “assault weapons” BANNED)—Dianne Feinstein has to be the MOST HATED woman in America today. And she just happens to be a Jew.
But does it really matter that Feinstein is a Jew?” Yes it does.
First of all, American Jewry is getting very nervous that a JEW is leading the attack on America’s most cherished possession affirmed by the Second Amendment, the right of personal sovereignty.
One Jewish group in particular, Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership, fears a backlash against American Jewry owing to the anti-gun lobbying of several national Jewish organizations.
Rabbi Aaron Zelman, founder of JPFO, puts it this way:
“By working to destroy the Bill of Rights, Jewish Groups are fanning the flames of anti-Semitism.
“A lot of Americans resent these people who trample on our fundamental rights.” View Entire Story Here.
But what is even more likely to “fan the flames” of anti-Semitism is due to the high number of HIGH PROFILE JEWS now at the forefront of trampling on the Second Amendment.
Abe Foxman’s mission to prevent a backlash against Jews is bound to fail when JEWISH NAMES like Feinstein, Blumenthal, Cardin, Wasserman-Shultz, Schumer, Israel, Boxer, Lautenberg, Bloomberg, are LEADING THE CHARGE to STRIP Americans of their guns.
It’s really a matter of personal ownership—(which underlies the right to bear arms in order to defend oneself and family)—that is at stake here.
And Dianne Feinstein, a Jew, is hell-bent on seizing ownership of every American citizen’s particular and personal individual body.

FEINSTEIN WANTS YOUR BODY
DO AMERICANS WANT TO BE OWNED by Dianne Feinstein?
Do Americans want to be owned by Jews?
Do Americans want a Jew like Feinstein and her ilk to tell them what they are allowed and not allowed to do with their OWN BODIES?
Do Americans who possess “grandfathered” weapons want the Jew Feinstein to preside over them being investigated, photographed, and fingerprinted…their firearms registered with local, state, and federal authorities by type and serial number?
For this is EXACTLY what this freedom-hating Jew Feinstein is pushing with her new piece of legislation.

WHAT GIVES FEINSTEIN THE RIGHT to moralize over Americans who work for a living when she herself is nothing but a contemptible parasite feeding off taxpayers’ hard-earned money for the entirety of her life and career?
Who gave this Jew the license to tell Gentiles what they can or cannot buy when she herself has enriched herself with a net worth of $ 108 million through insider trading due to being privy to companies about to receive large grants from Congress?
What gives Feinstein the right to deny families their inalienable right to arm and defend themselves when she herself has been legislating for homosexuality, lesbianism, and transgenderism, all of which militates against the preservation of the family?
Is it any wonder then that Dianne Feinstein is the MOST HATED woman in America today?
Would it be any surprise if Feinstein’s gun grab provokes a backlash against Jewry?
Is there any question in anybody’s mind that Feinstein—A JEW—is the enemy of America?

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@yahoo.com
___

For More See: Jews Lead Gun Control Charge Click Here
And: What Really Happened At Sandy Hook? Click Here
And: Why The Jews Want Your Guns Click Here
And: Jewry’s Plan For Universal Background Checks Click Here

Brother Nathanael @ January 31, 2013

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

The number one enemy of the Arabs? Russia

By , October 20, 2012 10:25 am

The number one enemy of the Arabs? Russia
By: Jake Wallis Simons on: 19.10.2012 [14:42 ] (370 reads)


The number one enemy of the Arabs? Russia

By Jake Wallis Simons
WorldLast updated: October 19th, 2012

Yusuf al-Qaradawi

Allow me to introduce the Egyptian cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, one of the most prominent Sunni Islamic scholars in the world.

You may remember him from 2008, when he was refused a visa to visit Britain after the Home Office said it would not tolerate the presence of those seeking to justify acts of terrorist violence; during a visit to London four years earlier, al-Qaradawi had referred to suicide attacks on Israelis as “martyrdom in the name of God” in an interview with the BBC.

But al-Qaradawi, although undeniably rather extreme by Western standards, is a complex figure. On the one hand, he has referred to the Holocaust as “divine punishment” which “put the Jews in their place”; supports attacks on Israeli civilians; has a longstanding hatred of the Shia (though he supports Hizbollah as they are sworn enemies of Israel); and has condoned the death sentence – in principle at least – for Muslims who turn their backs on the religion. On the other hand, he has denounced as “extremists” those who hold more extreme views than he does, opposes the notion of theocracy, supports the notion of democracy in the Middle East, and called upon Muslims to donate blood in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

The list goes on. Al-Qaradawi accepts “wife beating” as a “method of last resort”, yet stipulates it should only be done “lightly” and not on the face or other sensitive areas. He supports the practice of female circumcision, yet – strangely – only when it does no permanent harm. He believes that homosexuals and adulterers should be put to death, yet is clear in his belief that a raped woman has no culpability. He condemned the violence that followed the Danish cartoons of Muhammad in 2005, yet he endorsed the fatwa on Salman Rushdie. Al-Qaradawi may be extreme, but his position is more nuanced than many other clerics.

The Sheikh has been awarded numerous prizes for his work on Islamic theology, and is one of the most senior voices allied to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Most importantly of all, he broadcasts regularly on Al Jazeera to an audience of tens of millions, making him a profoundly influential figure.

This week, in a televised sermon on Qatar TV, he took the step of defining the foremost enemies of Arabs. Israel and the United States were not mentioned; instead, he said that “Russia has become the number one enemy of Islam and Muslims because it stood against the Syrian people; more than 30,000 Syrians have been killed by the weapons supplied by Russia.” He added that Iran and China, in supporting the Assad regime, formed an axis of enmity towards the Arabs, and he called upon the Security Council to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, just as it had done in Libya.

These allegiances and rivalries are not new. What is worth remarking upon, however, is the strength of the language used against Russia, China and Iran. Last week I commented on the article written by Abdulateef al-Mulhim, the former commodore of the Saudi Navy, which laid out the controversial argument that “the Arab world has many enemies, and Israel should have been at the bottom of the list.” In addition to citing the “enemies” of corruption, poor education, inadequate healthcare and so on, he pointed to “dictators” such as Assad in Syria as creating far more suffering and oppression than Israel and the West. Al-Qaradawi is nowhere near as explicit as the Saudi, but in his preoccupation with the threat posed by Russia, China and Iran, he is strengthening the narrative of conflict between a burgeoning “Persian empire” and the Arabs, and relegating that of a struggle between Muslims and Israel. He also implicitly aligns with increasing firmness the interests of the Arab world with those of the West, and even, to some extent, with Israel.

The Arab Spring has highlighted as never before the deep divisions, injustices and clashes of ideology inherent within the Islamic world. As the movement’s centre of gravity becomes entrenched in Syria, the geopolitical dynamics of the region are shifting. Coalition forces will soon be withdrawing from Afghanistan, and Israeli elections are looming; Netanyahu will almost certainly win, but it is not impossible for new alliances to form between the Likud and some of the centre-Left parties, which may inject a note of moderation into government policy. Within the next ten years, we may be surprised by an emerging prospect for a tentative peace between Israel and the Palestinians, and new allegiances forming around the globe. It may be in the Islamic countries that peace becomes more elusive

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jakewallissimons/100185634/the-number-one-enemy-of-the-arabs-russia/

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’

By , May 29, 2012 2:27 am

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’
By: Bulov on: 29.05.2012 [03:29 ] (52 reads)

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’
Get short URL
email story to a friend print version

Publish http://www.rt.com/news/julian-assange-occupy-activists-411/ed: 28 May, 2012, 21:04

Julian Assange meets with prominent Occupy activists
(9.5Mb) embed video

TRENDS: Occupy Wall Street
TAGS: UK, Protest, Politics, USA, Social networks, Assange, The Julian Assange Show

The Occupy movement has united hundreds of thousands across the world to fight social and economic inequality. Julian Assange meets with prominent Occupy activists who say their collective efforts target global institutions.

¬The stand-off between large financial institutions and those who call themselves the 99% was brought about by the financial crisis, which revealed serious gaps in the current system, David Graeber from Occupy New York explained, pointing out that “the revolt is always in the name of democracy.”

“There is the first really effective planetary bureaucracy which is created in the name of the sort of ‘free-market’ ideology, which is supposed to stand against it, bureaucracy, but in fact exactly the opposite,” he says.

Aaron Peters from Occupy London adds that social movements are “always born out of grievance” and what is happening now would be impossible without the global financial crisis.
Activists say the movement has come about at the right moment, when there is an immediate necessity to unite to stand for the economic and social rights of the majority.
“There’s a feeling out there that the enemy is becoming increasingly globalized, and the only way it can be challenged is by global movements,” Graeber said.

Although it is economic and social inequality that are named as the main causes behind Occupy, Alexa O’Brien from Occupy in New York and US Day of Rage says it is not just about the global financial crisis but also about a global political crisis – because “institutions are no longer functional.”
Peters agreed, saying that political failure is a global phenomenon.

“We now recognize that public policy outcomes aren’t happening at the national level, and that policy makers aren’t actually the ones who are in national parliaments. They are elsewhere, and the ones that are dictating policy aren’t any way accountable, or, you know, they are not democratic representatives,” he said.

Although Occupy came into being in the United States, the activists are certain that the preconditions of the movement can be traced back to the Arab Spring and to turbulence in Europe.
“There has been a sort of global movement that started in Tunisia and swept across the Mediterranean: Greece, Spain. So it’s really the same movement that hit America,” Graeber declared.
Activists also emphasized the collective nature of the international protest, saying that the movement was born out of the solidarity and cooperative efforts of many enthusiasts across the world with people from Spain, Egypt and other countries flying to the US to take part in Occupy Wall Street.

Stay tuned and watch the new episode of The Julian Assange Show exclusively on RT, Tuesday, 11:30 GMT.

iraqwar.mirror-world.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’

By , May 28, 2012 11:43 pm

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’
By: Bulov on: 29.05.2012 [03:29 ] (39 reads)

Assange Episode 7: Occupy, the movement to fight a global ‘enemy’
Get short URL
email story to a friend print version

Publish http://www.rt.com/news/julian-assange-occupy-activists-411/ed: 28 May, 2012, 21:04

Julian Assange meets with prominent Occupy activists
(9.5Mb) embed video

TRENDS: Occupy Wall Street
TAGS: UK, Protest, Politics, USA, Social networks, Assange, The Julian Assange Show

The Occupy movement has united hundreds of thousands across the world to fight social and economic inequality. Julian Assange meets with prominent Occupy activists who say their collective efforts target global institutions.

¬The stand-off between large financial institutions and those who call themselves the 99% was brought about by the financial crisis, which revealed serious gaps in the current system, David Graeber from Occupy New York explained, pointing out that “the revolt is always in the name of democracy.”

“There is the first really effective planetary bureaucracy which is created in the name of the sort of ‘free-market’ ideology, which is supposed to stand against it, bureaucracy, but in fact exactly the opposite,” he says.

Aaron Peters from Occupy London adds that social movements are “always born out of grievance” and what is happening now would be impossible without the global financial crisis.
Activists say the movement has come about at the right moment, when there is an immediate necessity to unite to stand for the economic and social rights of the majority.
“There’s a feeling out there that the enemy is becoming increasingly globalized, and the only way it can be challenged is by global movements,” Graeber said.

Although it is economic and social inequality that are named as the main causes behind Occupy, Alexa O’Brien from Occupy in New York and US Day of Rage says it is not just about the global financial crisis but also about a global political crisis – because “institutions are no longer functional.”
Peters agreed, saying that political failure is a global phenomenon.

“We now recognize that public policy outcomes aren’t happening at the national level, and that policy makers aren’t actually the ones who are in national parliaments. They are elsewhere, and the ones that are dictating policy aren’t any way accountable, or, you know, they are not democratic representatives,” he said.

Although Occupy came into being in the United States, the activists are certain that the preconditions of the movement can be traced back to the Arab Spring and to turbulence in Europe.
“There has been a sort of global movement that started in Tunisia and swept across the Mediterranean: Greece, Spain. So it’s really the same movement that hit America,” Graeber declared.
Activists also emphasized the collective nature of the international protest, saying that the movement was born out of the solidarity and cooperative efforts of many enthusiasts across the world with people from Spain, Egypt and other countries flying to the US to take part in Occupy Wall Street.

Stay tuned and watch the new episode of The Julian Assange Show exclusively on RT, Tuesday, 11:30 GMT.

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

To Know Your “Enemy,” Know Yourself: Towards a More Profound Objectivity

By , April 2, 2012 12:38 pm

“Objectivity” in reporting and analysis has developed a bad rep in recent years. The mainstream media is often blamed, but they’ve long considered it their responsibility to pit the two prevailing positions against each other. You could say it’s not the media’s fault that said positions, far from conservative and liberal, are most often center right to extreme right. But in the perceived need for access to power, the media too often accepts how far right well-funded conservative groups have slid the Overton Window.

When the spotlight is trained on reporting and analysis on our perceived enemies, the issue of objectivity is more deeply illuminated. In the spring issue of the Journal of Psychohistory (print only), psychoanalyst and Journal of Psychohistory assistant editor David Lotto explains in an article titled “On the Pot Calling the Kettle Black: The Perils of Psychohistorical Partisanship.”

Much of what psychohistorians are interested in is to understand the why of the many violent and destructive events which have and continue to cause so much misery in our world.

Difficulties ensue because …

A psychohistorian, being a part of the human race, is most often a member of or identified with one or more groups: an ethnic group, a nationality, or religion or perhaps more than one of each. … When the subject of a psychohistorical inquiry is one of these groups that the investigating psychohistorian does not belong to or is not identified with, the possibility arises of a biased or partisan account being given.

Especially “where the other can be accurately described as your enemy.” What Lotto is referring to, in part, is the endless psychoanalyses of the “terrorist mind” undertaken by authors and institutions. In other words, much more effort is expended on figuring out what makes al Qaeda and suicide terrorists tick than on what motivates the war-making mentality — and will to dominate — of the United States. “So what can be done?” asks Lotto.

One solution would be that anyone who is an “interested party” should remain silent — as a lawyer or judge might recuse her or himself from a case in which there was some meaningful connection to one of the parties.

But …

As psychohistorians we also want to encourage and not discourage those who want to explore, analyze, and hypothesize about the psychological motives that drive the actions of large groups or nations. Writing and publishing about such matters should be welcomed, not censored.

Aside from owning up to one’s affiliations, Lotto suggests (emphasis added) …

… that when engaging in psychohistorical analysis it would be useful to examine the behavior and motives of one’s own group or groups with whom one identifies that are similar to those being examined with respect to the other before embarking on the psychohistorical analysis of one’s enemies.

Furthermore, Lotto writes, if one sees only “the faults and psychopathology of others while being blind to similar processes operating within oneself and one’s own group. … there is the suspicion that projective identification is occurring — that one’s nasty and unacceptable aspects are too readily seen as being present in the enemy while absent in one’s own group.” As well “it affects the credibility of the source.”

Whenever I see a negative or harsh analysis of an enemy group which ignores the similar sins and shortcomings of one’s own group, I am immediately skeptical, as anyone who takes psychoanalytic psychohistory seriously should be, of the arguments made and conclusions drawn. 

To help us further understand how to approach a “traumatic historical event such as a war, genocide, massacre, or forced migration that involves victim and perpetrator groups [Lotto] would argue that it would be beneficial to discuss the trauma history of both groups.”

The purpose of this would be to attempt to avoid the demonization of the perpetrator group by understanding that the perpetrator group may be responding to some historical trauma of their own which is being enacted through the violence directed to the victim group.

Lotto concludes that …

… the two actions of applying one’s analysis of the enemy other to one’s own group and of attempting to be aware and open about one’s own identifications and personal motives for writing about the subject under consideration could lead to a lessening of the influence of unconscious and unacknowledged motives and feelings.

Islamic terrorists, he adds …

… have replaced the godless communists whom were the enemy that we obsessed over for almost 50 years. The hypocrisy, in which an analysis of the behavior and motives of our terrorist enemies that makes no effort to acknowledge behavior and motives that are identical or very similar to those for which the United States is responsible, can be seen as an expression of American exceptionalism.

Which is [insert drum roll introducing the money quote here] …

… basically a form of national narcissistic personality disorder.

FPIF Latest Content

Egypt’s Faceless Enemy

By , February 23, 2012 9:30 pm

Cairo — Overlooking the Nile, St Mary Church in the modern Maadi suburb of Cairo held a prayer for all Christian martyrs of the past year. Attendees tried to find comfort in the colourful mosaic of Virgin Mary. View full post on Assyrian International News Agency

WikiLeaks suspect charged with ‘aiding enemy’

By , February 23, 2012 9:28 pm

US soldier Bradley Manning declines to enter plea in military trial on 22 counts which could see him jailed for life. View full post on AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)

The Military, Not Mubarak, Was Egyptians’ Real Enemy

By , February 4, 2012 12:07 am

Aside from Egypt, perhaps no place in the world was more galvanized by the events in Cairo’s Tahrir Square last year than Washington. American policymakers and foreign policy experts on both sides of the aisle rallied behind the cause of the young men and women who braved violence at the hands of the country’s notoriously vicious state police to mar View full post on Assyrian International News Agency