Iraqi Dinar News

Trade Iraqi Dinar

Posts tagged: over

Iraq’s Unity Tested By Rising Tensions Over Oil-rich Kurdish Region

By , May 4, 2012 7:52 pm

Erbil, Iraq — In the capital of the Kurdish region, a gleaming new international airport welcomes visitors to a part of the country that is increasingly striking out on its own amid mounting questions over whether a united Iraq will survive.

Unlike Baghdad, foreign visitors landing on one of the ever-growing number of international flights to Erbil need no prior visa. That’s just one of the signs of autonomy in Iraqi Kurdistan, the country’s most prosperous and secure region.

Newly discovered oil has fueled the prosperity underpinning Kurdistan’s boldness. But it has also heightened tensions with Baghdad that have simmered for decades over land and identity. As Iraqi Kurdistan ramps up oil production that officials say could surpass Libya’s output by 2019, Kurdish leaders have warned they could seek full independence if disputes over oil revenues and power-sharing aren’t resolved.

“The Kurds will not live in the shadow of a dictatorial regime,” Massoud Barzani, the powerful president of the Kurdish region said in a speech in Erbil Friday. “The right to decide our destiny is a legitimate one and we ask others not to try to take this right from us.”

Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, head of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, told the Monitor in a recent interview he believes differences between Baghdad and Erbil can be solved.

“We can reach agreement on this,” he said, referring to the wider issue of Iraq’s fragile coalition government and increasingly bitter relations between Kurdish President Barzani and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. “We Iraqis had experiences many times on the brink of civil war — we retreated from that and we came back to dialogue and national unity.”

Not everyone agrees with the president’s assessment, however. Maliki’s far-reaching consolidation of power has rankled other regions and even his political allies, with Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr recently visiting Erbil for the first time in a sign of solidarity with the Kurds. Southern, oil-rich regions also pressing for more control

Nine years after Saddam Hussein was toppled, and two decades after breaking away from Baghdad, Iraqi Kurdistan is far more prosperous and secure than any other part of the country. Security has been maintained by the regional government’s strict controls on its de facto borders, including those ostensibly under the jurisdiction of the central government.

Kurdish support two years ago for Maliki’s coalition government was essential to the Shiite prime minister retaining his post after failing to win a majority of seats. Since then a power-sharing agreement which included the Kurds and the major Sunni political bloc has fallen apart with almost none of the provisions implemented.

Because of the political wrangling, Iraq has no interior or defense minister. Instead Maliki effectively oversees both, as well as an increasing number of intelligence and security services reorganized to fall directly under his command. In a country with some of the world’s biggest oil reserves, a proposed oil law mandating how revenue is shared between the provinces has never reached Parliament for a vote.

“We have to clearly define the oil law,” says Latif Rasheed, senior adviser to President Talabani. “Not only regarding central authorities but regional authorities — this is happening in Kurdistan now; tomorrow it might happen in Basra if it’s not clear.”

In addition to Kurdistan, other regions, including the south — which has seen little benefit from its vast oil reserves — have been pressing for more control. Some local government officials in Basra and Diyala have even raised the prospect of seeking autonomy.

Mr. Barzani, who next to Mr. Maliki has emerged as the most powerful politician in Iraq, has warned that the Kurds could “resort to other decisions” if the prime minister does not follow through on a power-sharing agreement. Barzani’s comments are widely seen as an implied threat to seek independence. Legacy of Saddam’s genocidal campaign

The legacy of Saddam Hussein’s military campaigns against the Kurds in the 1970s and 1980s has rekindled fears in Iraqi Kurdistan that a central government with unchecked powers could again pose a threat. That worry has been heightened by the withdrawal of US troops that served as a buffer between Erbil and Baghdad.

American protection in the form of a no-fly zone in 1991 created the semi-autonomous Kurdish region after the Kurds rose up against Mr. Hussein’s weakened regime when he was driven out of Kuwait. Deeply traumatized by Saddam’s genocidal campaign, two decades later Kurdish leaders have raised concerns in Washington over Iraq’s purchase of American F-16 fighter jets.

“It’s normal for Iraq to have an army, to have advanced weaponry but the concept of against whom that would be used this is what worries us,” says Falah Mustafa, the Kurdish regional government’s de facto foreign minister. “When we have worries about the nature of that army and the loyalty of that army we have all the right to be afraid because planes have been used against Kurdish people … so our tragic history tells us to be careful.”

Kurdish officials are adamant that they won’t seek the breakup of Iraq but many seem prepared for the possibility that Sunni-Shiite tension could splinter the country on its own.

Feeding into Iraq’s sectarian tensions, Sunni vice president Tariq al-Hashemi, wanted on terrorism charges, was given refuge in Iraqi Kurdistan and then allowed by the Kurdish government to leave the country, despite a no-travel order. He is now being tried in absentia in Baghdad.

As Kurdish political and economic power grows, ties with the rest of Iraq weaken. Most younger Kurds don’t speak Arabic and few feel a strong connection to the rest of the country.

“What is not independent about Kurdistan today?” says one Kurdish official speaking on condition of anonymity. “The fact that we get our money from Baghdad — that’s the only thing that’s left.” Kurdish ties with Turkey improve

Kurds are looking at the possibility of replacing that revenue from an unlikely source. Opposition from powerful Turkey has been one of the main reasons the Kurds have not sought more autonomy. But as Baghdad’s relations with Ankara have soured over accusations of Turkish interference in Iraqi affairs, Erbil’s ties with Turkey have improved dramatically.

Kurdish officials maintain they are discussing with Turkey plans to build crude oil and natural gas pipelines that would carry fuel directly from Iraqi Kurdistan to the neighboring country.

Talabani, who last month hosted Baghdad’s first Arab League summit in more than 20 years, maintains that it would be unrealistic for Kurds to push for independence despite calls by the younger generation to seek it.

The older Kurdish political elite spent years as mountain fighters followed by years in exile but Talabani says that for all Kurds in the region seeking control over their destiny, that era is over.

“Armed struggle is past — now we are in a parliamentarian struggle … we are always telling this to our [Kurdish] brothers in Turkey to understand the spirit of a new era,” he says. “This is not the time of partisan war or armed struggle. Look to the countries that use popular struggle; even they get freedom from dictatorship from other places, so through this kind of struggle people can achieve their goals.” 2 million barrels per day by 2019

The dispute over oil — potentially worth billions of dollars as new fields come on stream in Iraqi Kurdistan — is entangled in the wider issue of land, towns, and cities claimed by both the Iraqi and Kurdish governments — including the disputed city of Kirkuk. Kurds claim oil-rich Kirkuk as their historic capital, as do the Turkmen and other groups. Tens of thousands of non-Arabs were expelled from that city during Hussein’s campaign to Arabize the country.

“There are a number of issues that have to be sorted out — one is the disputed territories, which I think is much more serious than the oil,” says Mr. Rasheed, the Iraqi president’s adviser.

Oil though has become the driving force behind Kurdish aspirations. Since Barzani turned the tap on the first oil well in the Taq Taq field three years ago, Kurdish officials expect production to rise to 500,000 barrels per day in the next 1-1/2 years. They say it could reach 2 million barrels per day by 2019 — a higher output than oil producers such as Libya.

Reflecting the rising tension, the Kurdish government in April shut off oil exports bound for the Iraqi government pipeline to Turkey. Foreign companies have cut back production and are selling the remaining fuel within Iraqi Kurdistan — a move that contravenes long-standing agreement under which oil revenue is distributed by Baghdad. The companies and Kurdish authorities say it’s a necessary step to recover their costs after months of not being paid under existing agreements with the central government.

For many Iraqi Kurds, the question is whether the autonomy they have gained is enough or whether they should aim for more and risk losing it.

“It’s a tough one for any Kurd to balance their natural desire for any independence, which every Kurd has deep down, even Jalal Talabani, with a reality that puts what we have today in danger,” says Qubad Talabani, the Kurdish government’s representative in Washington and the president’s son. “I think that’s what every Kurd grapples with — what their heart tells them and what their head tells them.”

By Jane Arraf
Christian Science Monitor

Assyrian International News Agency

Over 110,000 US forces used psychotropic meds in 2011: Report

By , April 9, 2012 10:36 am

Over 110,000 US forces used psychotropic meds in 2011: Report
By: Press TV on: 09.04.2012 [06:19 ] (132 reads)

Over 110,000 US forces used psychotropic meds in 2011: Report
More than 110,000 active-duty American Army forces were on prescribed antidepressants, sedatives and other prescription medications in 2011. (File photo)
Mon Apr 9, 2012 6:14AM GMT
Share

We have never medicated our troops to the extent we are doing now…. And I don’t believe the current increase in suicides and homicides in the military is a coincidence.”

Former military psychologist Bart Billings
A recent report says that more than 110,000 active-duty US Army forces were on prescribed antidepressants, sedatives and other prescription medications in 2011, which reflects an eight-fold increase from 2005.

According to an article published by the Los Angeles Times, more than 110,000 active-duty Army troops last year were taking prescribed antidepressants, narcotics, sedatives, antipsychotics and anti-anxiety drugs.

That figure amounts to nearly 8% of the active-duty Army forces being on sedatives, and more than 6% are on antidepressants, eight times more than 2005.

“We have never medicated our troops to the extent we are doing now…. And I don’t believe the current increase in suicides and homicides in the military is a coincidence,” said Bart Billings, a former military psychologist.

Last year, US pilot Patrick Burke, who used to take a tablet of Dexedrine every four hours while flying a B-1 bomber across nine time zones, beat one of his friends and crashed a stolen car into guardrails in a fit of delirium mostly due to the medication he had been taking.

Burke was charged with auto theft, drunk driving and two counts of assault. Four military psychiatrists, however, concluded that the young lieutenant suffered from “polysubstance-induced delirium” caused by alcohol, lack of sleep and the 40 milligrams of Dexedrine.

US military officials claim that the use of drugs in the army is comparable to that by the civilians.

However, psychiatrists and lawyers, who blame the heavy use of psychotropic drugs for their clients’ aberrant behavior and related health problems, believe otherwise, attributing the abnormal conduct to harsh conditions imposed by the US-led wars.

MYA/GHN/HJL

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/235311.html

iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Is the Christian Era in the Middle East Over?

By , April 7, 2012 12:18 pm

Israel has become the only safe haven for Christians in the Middle East, Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, wrote in a recent op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal.

“As 800,000 Jews were once expelled from Arab countries, so are Christians being forced from lands they’ve inhabited for centuries”, Ambassador Oren stated, comparing the expulsion of Jews after the establishment of the state of Israel with the Arab countries’ current treatment of their Christian minorities.

The numbers are telling. Today there is only one Middle Eastern country where the number of Christians has grown: Israel. As documented in the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics, the Christian community that numbered 34,000 people in 1949 is now 163,000-strong, and will reach 187,000 in 2020.

In the rest of the Middle East, the drive for Islamic purity is going to banish all traces of pre-Islamic pasts. When the Islamists will have prevailed, the Middle East will be completely green, the colour of Islam.

Therefore, it is time for Christians to recognize Israel’s survival as critical and vital also for them. Instead, Arab Christians chose to react to Ambassador Oren by embracing Islam and demonizing the Jews.

“As Christian leaders in Palestine, we were appalled by the baseless allegations you published in the Wall Street Journal”, says one letter signed by many Arab Christian personalities published in the Palestinian media outlets. “Your attempt to blame the difficult reality that Palestinian Christians face on Palestinian Muslims is a shameful manipulation of the facts intended to mask the damage that Israel has done to our community. The Israeli occupation is the primary reason why so many members of the oldest Christian communities in the world have left the holy land, Palestine. Our reality is one of occupation, oppression and loss”.

The letter is signed by Palestinian ministries, activists, priests and mayors and members of the PLO.

Arab Christianity is near its extinction everywhere. “Christianity in Iraq could be eradicated in our lifetime, partially as a result of the US troop withdrawal”, declared Leonard Leo, chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.

In Egypt, 100,000 Christians already have left the country – after Hosni Mubarak’s fall last year. The Egyptian Union of Human Rights is denouncing this “mass exodus”.

Even more dramatic is the collapse of Christian Arab society following Israel’s handing over of large parts of Judea and Samaria to the Palestinian Authority. Christians have suffered the most from the mafia-style rule of Yasser Arafat’s kleptocracy.

Christian sites and cemeteries were desecrated by Muslims. Slogans like “Islam will win” and “First the Saturday people, then the Sunday People” have been painted on walls, and PLO flags were draped over Jesus crosses.

Ramallah was 90% Christian before the 1948 War of Independence and Bethlehem was 80% Christian. Today Ramallah is a large Islamic city and Bethlehem’s Christians are near extinction.

Given their common status as minorities within an overwhelmingly Islamic region, you might expect Christian Arabs to find common cause with Jews and Israel. But the traditional hatred of Eastern Christianity for Judaism, combined with the futile hopes for assimilation within the Arab world, have closed off that option.

As the letter clearly shows, Arab Christians are lost to Islam. This unavoidable historical process has been explained by the pioneer Bat Ye’or, the most important historian of the “dhimmitude”.

Many Palestinian terrorists came from the Christian community. George Habash, who has been dubbed “the godfather of Middle East terrorism”, was a Greek Orthodox Christian who sang in his church choir as a boy back in the town of Lydda. His background was almost identical to that of his best friend, Wadia Haddad, the No. 2 in the PFLP and the operational genius and passionate proponent of the group’s terrorist acts.

For years after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the public face of that nation’s diplomacy was deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, who was born with the distinctly Christian name of Michael Yuhanna.

British author, William Dalrymple, suggests that by the 1990s, five out of Hafiz al Asad’s seven closest advisors were Christian. Today, the suave symbol of the Palestinian cause in the West is a Christian, Hanan Ashrawi, who signed the letter against Oren.

Coptic Christians were prominent in the pioneering nationalist anti-Israel Wafd Party of Egypt in the 1920s. From the 1930s, Arab Christians were deeply influenced by the fascist and ultra-nationalist models they could see in Europe, and they formed their own parties in this mold.

One of the first was the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, founded by the Christian Antun Saadeh, who preached the establishment of a Great Syrian empire covering not just modern-day Syria but also Judea, Samaria, Lebanon, Cyprus, and other stretches of the Near East.

In 1940, another Christian thinker launched what would be a still more influential variety of pan-Arabism, namely the Movement for Arab Renaissance (Ba’th). The key founder was Michel Aflaq, who had been educated at the Sorbonne.

The most prominent Palestinian intellectual in the world was a Christian, Edward Said (it was in Nazareth, in fact, that Said’s mother was born; his grandfather founded the city’s first Baptist church).

The use of the term “nakba” for the Israeli War of Independence was an innovation of Constantin Zureiq, the intellectual father of Arab nationalism. George

Antonious’ book “The Arab Awakening” is one of the earliest intellectual expressions of Palestinian Arab resentment about Zionism. Antonious was far from alone as a Christian Arab who saw his future with the aspirations of the Muslim majority in the Arab world.

You also have the case of Azmi Bishara, the Arab MK who betrayed the State of Israel, who comes from a middle-class Christian family from Nazareth.

Meanwhile, in Lebanon, the Christian movements of General Michel Aoun and Sleiman Frangieh are allied with Hizbullah.

Christians have also been part of municipal councils headed by Hamas. Now that the Nasserite mixture of socialism and secularism is outclassed by Islamist fury, Christians are vanishing from their cradle.

Arab Christians are paying the anti-Israel appeasing choice: they feed the Islamic crocodile hoping it will eat them last. Nonetheless, the Islamic tiger is devouring the Christian lamb.

Indeed, the Christian era in the Middle East is coming to an end. After Arab nationalism failed to eliminate Israel, Arab Christianity and the Vatican are now building a Palestinian identity hostile to Israel and the Jews.

The Christian criminalization of Zionism, which Arab Churches made a basic condition for “Muslim-Christian rapprochement”, grants the elimination of the Jewish State priority over defending the rights of their own beleaguered communities.

As was the case of the European Christians in World War II, Arab Christianity is now pursuing a joint cause with evil forces to buy temporary security. They will be responsable for their own destruction. When in 1991, the first Iraqi Scuds hit the Tel Aviv area, Palestinians in Judea and Samaria and Gaza, in defiance of the curfew, mounted rooftops and joyfully chanted: “Saddam, Saddam, ya habib, oodroob oodroob Tel Abib” (“Saddam, Saddam, you darling, hit Tel Aviv over and over again”).

A few rocket attacks later, a paraphrased version of that ditty spread around: “Saddam, Saddam, our boss, go ahead and hit the Cross”.

Arab Christians have been Islamicized. Supported by the Vatican and the Orthodox Churches, they choose the war against the Jews. They will be paid back with their own extinction.

By Giulio Meotti
Frontpage Magazine

Assyrian International News Agency

Is the Christian Era in the Middle East Over?

By , April 7, 2012 12:18 pm

Israel has become the only safe haven for Christians in the Middle East, Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, wrote in a recent op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal.

“As 800,000 Jews were once expelled from Arab countries, so are Christians being forced from lands they’ve inhabited for centuries”, Ambassador Oren stated, comparing the expulsion of Jews after the establishment of the state of Israel with the Arab countries’ current treatment of their Christian minorities.

The numbers are telling. Today there is only one Middle Eastern country where the number of Christians has grown: Israel. As documented in the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics, the Christian community that numbered 34,000 people in 1949 is now 163,000-strong, and will reach 187,000 in 2020.

In the rest of the Middle East, the drive for Islamic purity is going to banish all traces of pre-Islamic pasts. When the Islamists will have prevailed, the Middle East will be completely green, the colour of Islam.

Therefore, it is time for Christians to recognize Israel’s survival as critical and vital also for them. Instead, Arab Christians chose to react to Ambassador Oren by embracing Islam and demonizing the Jews.

“As Christian leaders in Palestine, we were appalled by the baseless allegations you published in the Wall Street Journal”, says one letter signed by many Arab Christian personalities published in the Palestinian media outlets. “Your attempt to blame the difficult reality that Palestinian Christians face on Palestinian Muslims is a shameful manipulation of the facts intended to mask the damage that Israel has done to our community. The Israeli occupation is the primary reason why so many members of the oldest Christian communities in the world have left the holy land, Palestine. Our reality is one of occupation, oppression and loss”.

The letter is signed by Palestinian ministries, activists, priests and mayors and members of the PLO.

Arab Christianity is near its extinction everywhere. “Christianity in Iraq could be eradicated in our lifetime, partially as a result of the US troop withdrawal”, declared Leonard Leo, chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.

In Egypt, 100,000 Christians already have left the country – after Hosni Mubarak’s fall last year. The Egyptian Union of Human Rights is denouncing this “mass exodus”.

Even more dramatic is the collapse of Christian Arab society following Israel’s handing over of large parts of Judea and Samaria to the Palestinian Authority. Christians have suffered the most from the mafia-style rule of Yasser Arafat’s kleptocracy.

Christian sites and cemeteries were desecrated by Muslims. Slogans like “Islam will win” and “First the Saturday people, then the Sunday People” have been painted on walls, and PLO flags were draped over Jesus crosses.

Ramallah was 90% Christian before the 1948 War of Independence and Bethlehem was 80% Christian. Today Ramallah is a large Islamic city and Bethlehem’s Christians are near extinction.

Given their common status as minorities within an overwhelmingly Islamic region, you might expect Christian Arabs to find common cause with Jews and Israel. But the traditional hatred of Eastern Christianity for Judaism, combined with the futile hopes for assimilation within the Arab world, have closed off that option.

As the letter clearly shows, Arab Christians are lost to Islam. This unavoidable historical process has been explained by the pioneer Bat Ye’or, the most important historian of the “dhimmitude”.

Many Palestinian terrorists came from the Christian community. George Habash, who has been dubbed “the godfather of Middle East terrorism”, was a Greek Orthodox Christian who sang in his church choir as a boy back in the town of Lydda. His background was almost identical to that of his best friend, Wadia Haddad, the No. 2 in the PFLP and the operational genius and passionate proponent of the group’s terrorist acts.

For years after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the public face of that nation’s diplomacy was deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, who was born with the distinctly Christian name of Michael Yuhanna.

British author, William Dalrymple, suggests that by the 1990s, five out of Hafiz al Asad’s seven closest advisors were Christian. Today, the suave symbol of the Palestinian cause in the West is a Christian, Hanan Ashrawi, who signed the letter against Oren.

Coptic Christians were prominent in the pioneering nationalist anti-Israel Wafd Party of Egypt in the 1920s. From the 1930s, Arab Christians were deeply influenced by the fascist and ultra-nationalist models they could see in Europe, and they formed their own parties in this mold.

One of the first was the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, founded by the Christian Antun Saadeh, who preached the establishment of a Great Syrian empire covering not just modern-day Syria but also Judea, Samaria, Lebanon, Cyprus, and other stretches of the Near East.

In 1940, another Christian thinker launched what would be a still more influential variety of pan-Arabism, namely the Movement for Arab Renaissance (Ba’th). The key founder was Michel Aflaq, who had been educated at the Sorbonne.

The most prominent Palestinian intellectual in the world was a Christian, Edward Said (it was in Nazareth, in fact, that Said’s mother was born; his grandfather founded the city’s first Baptist church).

The use of the term “nakba” for the Israeli War of Independence was an innovation of Constantin Zureiq, the intellectual father of Arab nationalism. George

Antonious’ book “The Arab Awakening” is one of the earliest intellectual expressions of Palestinian Arab resentment about Zionism. Antonious was far from alone as a Christian Arab who saw his future with the aspirations of the Muslim majority in the Arab world.

You also have the case of Azmi Bishara, the Arab MK who betrayed the State of Israel, who comes from a middle-class Christian family from Nazareth.

Meanwhile, in Lebanon, the Christian movements of General Michel Aoun and Sleiman Frangieh are allied with Hizbullah.

Christians have also been part of municipal councils headed by Hamas. Now that the Nasserite mixture of socialism and secularism is outclassed by Islamist fury, Christians are vanishing from their cradle.

Arab Christians are paying the anti-Israel appeasing choice: they feed the Islamic crocodile hoping it will eat them last. Nonetheless, the Islamic tiger is devouring the Christian lamb.

Indeed, the Christian era in the Middle East is coming to an end. After Arab nationalism failed to eliminate Israel, Arab Christianity and the Vatican are now building a Palestinian identity hostile to Israel and the Jews.

The Christian criminalization of Zionism, which Arab Churches made a basic condition for “Muslim-Christian rapprochement”, grants the elimination of the Jewish State priority over defending the rights of their own beleaguered communities.

As was the case of the European Christians in World War II, Arab Christianity is now pursuing a joint cause with evil forces to buy temporary security. They will be responsable for their own destruction. When in 1991, the first Iraqi Scuds hit the Tel Aviv area, Palestinians in Judea and Samaria and Gaza, in defiance of the curfew, mounted rooftops and joyfully chanted: “Saddam, Saddam, ya habib, oodroob oodroob Tel Abib” (“Saddam, Saddam, you darling, hit Tel Aviv over and over again”).

A few rocket attacks later, a paraphrased version of that ditty spread around: “Saddam, Saddam, our boss, go ahead and hit the Cross”.

Arab Christians have been Islamicized. Supported by the Vatican and the Orthodox Churches, they choose the war against the Jews. They will be paid back with their own extinction.

By Giulio Meotti
Frontpage Magazine

Assyrian International News Agency

Muslim Brotherhood Seems Poised to Take Over in Egypt

By , April 5, 2012 8:59 am
Posted GMT 4-4-2012 23:16:40

The Egyptian revolution has led to economic bankruptcy, says Egypt’s Boutros Boutros-Ghali, a former U.N. secretary-general. Factories are closed and Egyptian workers are no longer wanted abroad, he lamented.

Sub-Saharan Africans and Pakistanis from Baluchistan have replaced Egyptians who once worked in Libya and oil-rich Persian Gulf countries, adding millions to the 12 percent unemployed among Egypt’s 85 million.

Mr. Boutros-Ghali, a Coptic Christian, also says Egypt hasn’t found a leader who could benefit from last year’s revolution. But that’s not quite the way the much-feared Muslim Brotherhood sees it.

After lulling Egypt’s millions into a false sense of security by pledging they weren’t interested in running anyone for president of Egypt, they have reversed field. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Khairat el-Shater, officially No. 2 in the radical religious order but in reality one of Egypt’s wealthiest men, will be the country’s next president, succeeding the ailing Hosni Mubarak, now confined to a prison hospital.

The Muslim Brotherhoodwon 49 percent of the seats in a relatively free election, and radical religious Salafists won 25 percent, more than enough to clinch the presidency. But some of the less-radical Muslim Brothers say it’s not a slam dunk. The army is still in charge of the country and its political landscape. Under the Mubarak regime, Mr. Shater was in and out of military prisons, and he knows this could happen again.

Regardless, the Muslim Brotherhood will have the principal voice in drafting a new constitution, which is bound to make it an Islamist document.

At first, the Muslim Brotherhood also said it didn’t want to interfere with Egypt’s 1979 peace treaty with Israel. Now Muslim Brotherhood watchers say that was tactical sleight-of-hand to pacify army brass, heavily dependent on $ 1.3 billion in U.S. aid annually for its part in keeping the peace with Israel. The military will be on guard against Muslim Brotherhood troublemakers on the Egyptian-Israeli border in Gaza and the Sinai.

Uncertainty on the Israeli-Egyptian border reinforces hard-liners in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud-led coalition, which is determined not to bite the bullet for an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank – or at least not for one that would be truly independent.

One of the most optimistic Arab voices about the chances for a Palestinian state, come hell or high water, has been the moderate voice of one of Jordan’s best-known political figures, now vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Marwan Muasher, a former Jordanian foreign minister and deputy prime minister, now says, and a rapidly growing number of Mideast experts concur, that there isn’t a snowball’s chance in the Sahara for a Palestinian state in the West Bank – now, tomorrow, or anytime soon – and that Israel is now condemned to continue its army occupation of the West Bank for the foreseeable future.

Some 340,000 Israelis live in 120 settlements whose population grows by 5.5 percent a year, almost thrice the rate in Israel. They live under Israeli military protection. They have their own connecting roads that Palestinians aren’t allowed to use. And they control the aquifer water under the West Bank.

Palestinians now claim to be akin to South Africa’s black population under apartheid. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, when he was out of government, said at some future point, the number of settlers in the West Bank will become too great for the Jewish state to extricate itself, and thus Israel will become an “apartheid state,” and “that would be a tragedy for us.”

A civil war next door in Syria also is not conducive to Israeli concessions.

Some Israelis are hoping that a successful air attack on some of Iran’s key nuclear installations will once again elicit the admiration of the world, much as the Six Day War victory did in 1967. But this won’t remove the apartheid stigma in the West Bank. Nor does it take into account Iran’s still formidable, asymmetrical retaliatory capabilities.

By Arnaud de Borchgrave
Washington Times

Assyrian International News Agency

Kurds Halt Crude Exports Over Pay Dispute With Baghdad

By , April 1, 2012 7:29 pm
Posted GMT 4-2-2012 0:37:1

Authorities in Iraq’s semi- autonomous Kurdish region halted crude oil exports today due to a pay dispute with the central government in Baghdad.

The Iraqi government has failed to pay money owed to oil producers since May 2011, according to a statement from the Kurdish Ministry of Natural Resources. The ministry has estimated the amount owed at $ 1.5 billion.

“There have been no payments for 10 months, nor any indication from federal authorities that payments are forthcoming,” it said.

Last week the Kurdistan Regional Government called on foreign companies including BP Plc not to make separate agreements with Iraq’s central government to develop oil fields in and around the disputed northern city of Kirkuk. The central government has said it is talking with BP about boosting output at a field called Kirkuk, near the same city.

In February Iraq produced 2.76 million barrels a day of crude, most of which comes from southern fields, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Kurds last week cut their production from 175,000 barrels a day to 50,000 barrels a day over the pay dispute.

An earlier disagreement over oil revenues between Iraq’s government and Kurdish authorities led to a yearlong halt in exports from the region that ended in February 2011. Iraq holds the world’s fifth-biggest crude reserves, based on BP statistics that also include Canadian oil sands, and it seeks to boost oil exports to help rebuild an economy recovering after years of conflict, sanctions and sabotage.

By Danielle Ivory and Zaid Sabah
Bloomberg

Assyrian International News Agency

Iran gains over $60 billion annually through raising fuel prices

By , March 31, 2012 7:47 pm

Iran gains over $ 60 billion annually through raising fuel prices
By: trend on: 31.03.2012 [08:40 ] (294 reads)

Iran gains over $ 60 billion annually through raising fuel prices
31 March 2012, 13:27 (GMT+05:00)

Azerbaijan, Baku, Mar. 31 /Trend F.Milad/

Increasing fuel prices, based on the Subsidy Reform Plan, has gained Iran some 740 trillion rials (over $ 60 billion) in the past calendar year, which ended on March 19, Khabaronline website quoted the Iranian parliament (Majlis) research center as reporting.

According to the report, the total budget which had been allocated to the Subsidy Reform Plan in the past year was just 540 trillion rials (some $ 44 billion). Therefore, the Islamic Republic’s income out of increasing prices of gasoline, gas oil and kerosene has been around $ 16 billion more than the forecasted figure.

The surplus income has been made in a situation that a Majlis deputy announced in February the administration of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has borrowed 80 trillion rials (some $ 6.5 billion) from the Central Bank to pay cash handouts.

The Jahan-e Sanat daily quoted Gholamreza Mesbahi Moqaddam, Head of Majlis Economic Committee, as saying on February 16 that based on the Supreme Audit Court, the government has borrowed 80 trillion rials from the Central Bank.

However, the sum had been paid to the government not from the subsidy reform resources, but using other resources, according to Mesbahi Moqaddam. This is while the law has stipulated that to pay cash subsidies, only the related resources should be used, but the government has used other resources in this regard.

The Subsidy Reform Plan has faced ups and downs as well as criticisms since its start of implementation a year ago. The date of implementing the second phase of the plan is still unknown.

Meanwhile, the administration announced last week that it has remitted 280,000 rials to accounts of families for each person as the balance of the first phase and the second phase. The move was reacted by the Majlis in opposition with the issue.

Members of the parliament declared that the administration has practically started the second phase of plan, without being approved by the parliament.

The parliament members also blamed the government for not paying due attention to the production sector, as it has been stipulated in the subsidy reform law, and that the budget has been directly paid to end consumers.

The government’s revenues out of selling gasoline, gas oil, kerosene and liquefied gas, have increased 164 trillion rials, 311 trillion rials, 40 trillion rials, and 24 trillion rials, respectively.

According to analysts, the President Ahmadinejad’s decision toward increasing cash subsidies could swell inflation and make the burden of debts of the next administration heavier.

http://en.trend.az/regions/iran/2008964.html

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

Swedish minister quits over Saudi arms plant row

By , March 30, 2012 5:42 am

Swedish minister quits over Saudi arms plant row
By: reuters on: 30.03.2012 [05:14 ] (84 reads)

Swedish minister quits over Saudi arms plant row

STOCKHOLM: Sweden’s defence minister was forced to quit on Thursday after weeks of pressure over reports the Nordic state planned to help Saudi Arabia build a weapons plant.

Arms sales to Saudi Arabia have caused criticism in a country which prides itself on standing up for human rights, and the reports about aid for the weapons plant sparked an outcry. Defence Minister Sten Tolgfors survived initial reports in early March by public radio about plans for a state-run defence research agency, FOI, to help Saudi Arabia build the plant by saying he had not known of them and that FOI had over-stepped its authority.

But reports of the details of the affair have continued to surface, steadily increasing pressure on him. “He (Tolgfors) has resigned at his own request,” said Roberta Alenius, spokeswoman for Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt. The minority centre-right government, which consists of four parties, has fallen behind in opinion polls after the largest opposition party the Social Democrats named a popular new leader. reuters

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2012\story_30-3-2012_pg4_5

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news

KRG Demands Say Over Kirkuk Oil Contracts

By , March 27, 2012 2:31 am

KRG Demands Say Over Kirkuk Oil Contracts

The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has issued the follow statement on the reported granting of a contract to BP for the development of oilfields in Kirkuk:

Neither Iraq’s federal oil ministry nor state-owned oil companies have the right to unilaterally award contracts to develop currently producing fields in Kirkuk province or in other adjacent areas, Kurdistan Regional Government’s Ministry of Natural Resources said today.

Management of oil and gas in Iraq does not fall under the exclusive powers of the federal government, the ministry said, adding, “Article 112 of Iraq’s Constitution states that the federal government and the regional and producing governorates shall together manage the present producing oil fields.”

The term ‘present producing fields’ in article 112 means the fields already under production at the time Iraq’s permanent Constitution was approved in 2005.

The ministry said, “However, article 115 provides the exclusive right to the regions and governorates to manage all future fields — that is, the undeveloped discoveries and unexplored structures.”

It said the KRG agrees that “in both cases – that is, present and future fields – the net revenue derived from the exploitation of any of the oil and gas resources belongs to all Iraqi people and as such is required to be distributed in a fair manner in proportion to the population”.

The Ministry of Natural Resources’ comments followed reports that the state-owned North Oil Company had signed or was about to sign a preliminary agreement with BP to increase production at the Kirkuk field.

Iraq Business News

Moscow cries foul over UN human rights resolution on Syria

By , March 25, 2012 12:32 am

Moscow cries foul over UN human rights resolution on Syria
By: trend on: 25.03.2012 [05:11 ] (76 reads)

Moscow cries foul over UN human rights resolution on Syria
24 March 2012, 19:24 (GMT+04:00)

Russia has sharply criticized the UN Human Rights Council’s resolution on Syria, adopted on Friday, saying that it “went against the international efforts on settling the conflict,” Foreign Ministry said on Saturday, RIA Novosti reported.

“The adoption of the biased and inadequate resolution goes against the efforts of the international community on stabilizing the situation in Syria,” the ministry said in a statement.

The resolution that strongly condemned the “sharply escalating widespread, systematic and gross violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms perpetrated by the Syrian authorities,” was adopted on Friday by the 47-member UN Human Rights Council. A total of 41 states-members supported the document, while Russia, China, and Cuba voted against it.

As the resolution puts the blame only on the Syrian government, it does not make any demands to the armed opposition, the ministry said.

Russian diplomats also said they were working on the amendments that would balance the text of the document, including those condemning the recent terrorist attacks in Damascus and Aleppo which Moscow viewed as “provocations” designed to disrupt the reconciliation efforts. The Council’s members however dismissed Moscow’s proposals.

According to the UN estimates, over 8,000 people have been killed in Syria since the beginning of an uprising against Assad a year ago. Syrian human rights groups have estimated the death toll at 9,100, while the government says some 2,000 police and security officers have been killed by members of “armed terrorist gangs.”

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev who will hold talks with the UN and Arab League envoy to Syria Kofi Annan on Sunday in Moscow, will urge to stop funding opposition and support its political ambitions, presidential aide Sergei Prikhodko said on Saturday.

http://en.trend.az/regions/met/arabicr/2006535.html

www.iraq-war.ru (en) RSS feed for articles and news